Future Trends in Medical Coding Systems

Future Trends in Medical Coding Systems

Importance of Annual Updates in Medical Coding

The field of medical coding has always been an essential component of the healthcare industry, ensuring that patient data is accurately recorded and billed. Staffing solutions cater to both permanent and temporary hiring needs medical staffing insurance depreciation. As we look into the future, technological advancements are poised to significantly transform this crucial aspect of healthcare systems. The integration of new technologies promises not only to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of medical coding but also to redefine how healthcare providers manage and utilize patient information.


One of the most significant impacts of technological advancements on medical coding is the automation facilitated by artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. These technologies have the potential to revolutionize traditional coding processes by automating repetitive tasks, reducing human error, and increasing productivity. AI algorithms can quickly analyze vast amounts of medical records, identifying relevant codes with greater precision than manual methods. This shift towards automation not only streamlines operations but also allows coders to focus on more complex cases that require human expertise.


Moreover, natural language processing (NLP) is breaking new ground in understanding unstructured data from clinical documentation. By converting narrative text into structured data, NLP enables more accurate coding by discerning context and extracting pertinent information from physicians' notes. This capability reduces discrepancies in code assignments and enhances consistency across different healthcare settings.


Another transformative trend is the adoption of blockchain technology for secure and transparent management of health information. Blockchain's decentralized nature ensures tamper-proof record-keeping, which can improve trustworthiness in billing practices and deter fraudulent activities. With its ability to maintain a comprehensive audit trail, blockchain could ease compliance with regulatory requirements while safeguarding patient privacy.


Furthermore, cloud computing offers scalable solutions for storing and processing massive volumes of health data generated daily. Cloud-based platforms facilitate seamless collaboration among medical coders working remotely or across multiple locations, enabling real-time updates and access to shared resources. This connectivity fosters a more integrated approach to medical coding practices globally.


The Internet of Things (IoT) is also influencing future trends in medical coding systems by expanding the sources from which health data is gathered. Wearable devices and smart sensors provide continuous streams of patient information that need to be coded accurately for effective monitoring and treatment plans. As IoT becomes more prevalent in healthcare settings, coders will need to adapt their skills to incorporate these diverse data inputs into existing frameworks.


Despite these promising developments, challenges remain in fully realizing the benefits of technological advancements in medical coding. Ensuring interoperability between different systems remains a critical hurdle as standardization efforts lag behind rapid innovation. Additionally, there is an ongoing need for training programs that equip coders with the skills necessary to work alongside advanced technologies effectively.


In conclusion, technological advancements are set to play a pivotal role in shaping the future landscape of medical coding systems. While they offer tremendous opportunities for enhancing efficiency and accuracy within this domain, careful consideration must be given to overcoming challenges related to system integration and workforce adaptation. By embracing these innovations thoughtfully, healthcare providers can leverage technology's full potential in delivering high-quality care through improved documentation practices.

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) into medical coding systems represents a transformative shift in the healthcare industry, promising to redefine how medical information is processed and utilized. As we peer into the future of medical coding, it's clear that AI and ML are poised to address several longstanding challenges while opening up new avenues for innovation and efficiency.


Medical coding, an essential process in healthcare billing and administration, involves translating complex medical diagnoses, procedures, and treatments into standardized codes. This enables seamless communication across healthcare providers and insurance companies. Traditionally reliant on human coders who meticulously review patient records, this process has been fraught with inefficiencies and susceptibility to human error. Enter AI and ML-technologies primed to revolutionize this landscape by enhancing accuracy, speed, and consistency.


One of the most immediate benefits of integrating AI into medical coding is the reduction of errors. Machine learning algorithms can be trained on vast datasets to recognize patterns in medical documentation far beyond a human's capacity. These algorithms can swiftly identify appropriate codes based on context and historical data, minimizing discrepancies that often lead to claim denials or delays in reimbursement. Additionally, AI systems can continuously learn from new data inputs, improving their accuracy over time-something that static rule-based systems cannot achieve.


Beyond error reduction, AI-driven coding systems promise significant improvements in efficiency. Automated processes can handle large volumes of data at speeds unimaginable for human coders. This not only accelerates the billing cycle but also frees up skilled professionals to focus on more complex cases requiring nuanced judgment-thereby optimizing resource allocation within healthcare facilities.


Moreover, as natural language processing (NLP) technologies advance, we can anticipate even deeper integration between electronic health records (EHRs) and coding systems. NLP can analyze unstructured text from clinical notes or radiology reports with remarkable precision, enabling automated extraction of relevant information for coding purposes without manual intervention.


Looking ahead, the implications of these advancements extend beyond operational efficiencies. With improved data accuracy comes robust analytics capabilities-healthcare organizations will be better equipped to conduct population health studies or assess treatment outcomes across diverse demographics. Furthermore, as AI models become more sophisticated through federated learning-a technique allowing models to learn collaboratively while retaining data privacy-the possibilities for personalized medicine grow exponentially.


However, this technological evolution is not without its challenges. The ethical considerations surrounding patient privacy must be addressed diligently; ensuring compliance with regulatory frameworks like HIPAA remains paramount when deploying AI solutions that handle sensitive health information.


Additionally, there will be a need for continuous collaboration between technologists developing these AI tools and clinicians who understand the intricacies of patient care pathways-a symbiotic relationship necessary for creating solutions that are both technically sound and clinically relevant.


In conclusion, as we envision future trends in medical coding systems shaped by AI and ML integration-the potential benefits are profound: heightened accuracy reducing costly errors; enhanced efficiency streamlining workflows; enriched data enabling insightful analysis-all contributing towards improved patient outcomes while safeguarding critical ethical standards within healthcare delivery systems worldwide.

Key Changes and Additions to the Latest ICD-10-CM Code Set

In the ever-evolving landscape of healthcare, one of the most critical aspects that continues to demand attention is the management and security of medical records. With increasing incidences of data breaches and growing concerns about patient privacy, there is a pressing need for robust systems that can offer enhanced security and transparency. One technological innovation that holds immense potential in addressing these challenges is blockchain.


Blockchain, often associated with cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, is a decentralized digital ledger technology that records transactions across multiple computers so that the record cannot be altered retroactively without the alteration of all subsequent blocks. This inherent feature makes it an ideal candidate for securing sensitive information such as medical records.


One of the primary roles blockchain can play in enhancing security within medical coding systems is through its decentralized nature. Unlike traditional databases that are vulnerable to single points of failure or attack, blockchain's distributed network ensures that no single entity has control over all the data. This decentralization significantly reduces the risk of unauthorized access or data breaches, which are prevalent with centralized systems.


Moreover, blockchain's use of cryptographic techniques ensures that any data entered into the system remains immutable and tamper-proof. Each transaction or modification made to a medical record would be recorded as a new block in the chain, complete with a timestamp and unique cryptographic signature. This level of transparency not only enhances security but also allows for detailed audit trails. Healthcare providers can trace back every change made to a patient's record, offering unparalleled accountability and trust.


In addition to bolstering security measures, blockchain technology can bring about unprecedented transparency in medical coding systems. With transparent and verifiable records accessible to authorized parties across different healthcare institutions, there is potential for improved interoperability among disparate health information systems. This could lead to more comprehensive patient care by ensuring that healthcare professionals have access to accurate and complete patient histories regardless of where they were originally documented.


Furthermore, patients themselves stand to benefit from this increased transparency. Empowered with secure access to their own health records on a blockchain-based system, individuals can take greater control over their personal health information. They would have the ability to share their data seamlessly with different healthcare providers while maintaining privacy through encrypted permissions.


As we look toward future trends in medical coding systems, integrating blockchain technology presents itself as a promising frontier. However, it is essential to recognize that while blockchain offers significant advantages in terms of security and transparency, its implementation comes with challenges such as scalability issues and regulatory considerations.


Nevertheless, ongoing research and pilot projects continue exploring ways around these hurdles-such as hybrid models combining public blockchains' transparency with private ones' control-to harness this innovative technology effectively within healthcare settings.


In conclusion, embracing blockchain technology could revolutionize how we handle medical records by providing enhanced security against cyber threats while promoting greater transparency throughout healthcare ecosystems worldwide-ultimately leading us toward safer practices in managing sensitive patient information efficiently yet responsibly within future trends emerging across our evolving digital era's complex tapestry woven intricately into modern medicine's fabric today!

Key Changes and Additions to the Latest ICD-10-CM Code Set

Impact of Updates on Healthcare Providers and Coders

The future of medical coding systems is poised for a transformative shift as healthcare organizations increasingly transition to cloud-based solutions. This evolution is driven by the pressing need to enhance accessibility and foster collaboration among healthcare professionals, ultimately aiming to improve patient care and streamline administrative processes.


In traditional setups, medical coding systems are often localized in on-premises servers, which can limit access, flexibility, and scalability. These constraints hinder the seamless sharing of information across different departments and facilities. However, with the advent of cloud-based solutions, these barriers are gradually being dismantled. Cloud technology offers a centralized platform where data can be accessed in real time from any location with an internet connection. This means that physicians, coders, and administrators can collaborate more effectively without being tied down by geographical limitations.


One of the most significant advantages of transitioning to cloud-based medical coding systems is improved accessibility. In an industry where timely access to accurate information can significantly impact patient outcomes, having a system that allows for quick retrieval and updating of records is crucial. Cloud-based solutions enable healthcare providers to access up-to-date coding databases and guidelines instantly, ensuring that they always have the latest tools at their disposal to make informed decisions.


Moreover, this transition enhances collaboration not only within individual organizations but also across the entire healthcare ecosystem. Cloud platforms facilitate easier communication between different entities such as hospitals, insurance companies, and regulatory bodies. They allow for more straightforward integration with other health information systems like electronic health records (EHRs) or practice management software. This interconnectedness ensures that everyone involved in patient care has consistent access to vital information needed for billing accuracy and compliance with regulations.


Besides boosting efficiency in day-to-day operations, cloud-based solutions contribute significantly to reducing costs associated with maintaining physical infrastructure and manual processes. By hosting data on remote servers managed by specialized vendors, healthcare organizations can minimize expenditures related to hardware upgrades or IT staffing while benefiting from cutting-edge security measures designed specifically for protecting sensitive health information.


As we look towards the future trends in medical coding systems, it becomes evident that embracing cloud technology will be indispensable in overcoming current challenges facing healthcare delivery today-particularly those related to accessibility limitations or fragmented workflows due largely because outdated infrastructures continue impeding progress toward achieving integrated care models necessary moving forward successfully into tomorrow's dynamic landscape wherein interoperability remains key driver behind success stories emerging worldwide among early adopters already reaping benefits afforded through leveraging advanced digital capabilities brought forth via innovative technological advancements steadily redefining how medicine practiced globally now more than ever before seen throughout history until now unfolding before us here today live together collectively witnessing firsthand what lies ahead waiting eagerly just beyond horizon beckoning onward boldly forging new pathways previously unimagined possible transforming lives forever positively impacting countless individuals everywhere alike without exception truly remarkable indeed!

Strategies for Staying Informed About Code Changes

The landscape of medical coding is undergoing significant transformation, driven by emerging standards and regulations poised to shape its future. As healthcare becomes increasingly digitized, the demand for precise and efficient medical coding systems has never been greater. These systems serve as a critical backbone for healthcare management, influencing everything from billing processes to patient care quality. In this context, emerging standards and regulations are playing a pivotal role in redefining how medical coding systems will evolve.


At the forefront of these changes is the transition towards more unified global coding standards. The adoption of ICD-11 (International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision) is a testament to this trend. Designed to be more user-friendly and comprehensive than its predecessors, ICD-11 offers enhanced classification capabilities that accommodate new diseases and conditions, reflecting advancements in medical science. This move towards a globally recognized standard not only facilitates international collaboration but also ensures consistency across borders, thus improving data accuracy and reliability.


Moreover, regulatory frameworks are increasingly emphasizing interoperability between disparate healthcare systems. The push for standardized electronic health records (EHRs) has resulted in regulations that mandate seamless integration across various platforms. These regulations aim to break down silos within healthcare organizations by ensuring that data can flow freely between different systems without losing integrity or meaning. This shift towards interoperability is crucial for improving patient outcomes by enabling holistic views of patient histories and facilitating better-informed clinical decisions.


Another significant trend shaping the future of medical coding is the emphasis on data security and privacy. With the increasing digitization of health information comes heightened vulnerability to cybersecurity threats. Regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the United States set stringent requirements for protecting patient information. These regulations necessitate robust encryption methods and secure data handling practices within medical coding systems to safeguard sensitive information against unauthorized access.


Artificial intelligence (AI) is also becoming an integral component in modernizing medical coding systems. Emerging standards now encourage incorporating AI technologies into coding practices to enhance efficiency and reduce human error. Machine learning algorithms can analyze vast datasets quickly, identifying patterns that might be missed by human coders. This capability not only accelerates the coding process but also improves accuracy, ultimately leading to better resource allocation within healthcare institutions.


Lastly, there is a growing recognition of the need for continuous education among medical coders due to these evolving standards and regulations. As new technologies emerge and existing ones evolve, staying abreast with current trends becomes essential for maintaining competency in this field. Training programs that focus on emerging technologies such as AI integration into EHRs are becoming more prevalent, ensuring that coders remain equipped with up-to-date knowledge necessary for navigating this dynamic landscape.


In conclusion, emerging standards and regulations are undeniably shaping the future of medical coding systems by driving advancements towards global unification, enhancing interoperability across platforms, emphasizing data security measures, integrating AI technologies into practice, and fostering continuous professional development among coders. These developments promise not only improved operational efficiencies but also substantial enhancements in overall patient care quality as we move forward into an increasingly digital era of healthcare delivery.

Challenges and Solutions in Adapting to New Codes

The landscape of medical coding is undergoing a transformative shift with the advent of next-generation coding technologies. These innovations promise to revolutionize the way healthcare data is recorded, processed, and utilized. However, as with any technological evolution, the path to widespread adoption is fraught with both challenges and opportunities.


One of the primary challenges in adopting new medical coding technologies is the complexity inherent in transitioning from established systems to novel ones. The healthcare industry has long relied on traditional coding methods such as ICD-10 and CPT codes. Introducing new technologies requires significant retraining for healthcare professionals who are accustomed to these legacy systems. This transition necessitates comprehensive training programs to ensure that coders can effectively utilize advanced tools like AI-driven coding software or natural language processing (NLP) applications.


Moreover, integrating next-generation coding technologies into existing healthcare infrastructure poses a logistical challenge. Many healthcare facilities operate on tight budgets and may struggle with the financial burden of upgrading their systems. This includes not only purchasing new software but also investing in compatible hardware and ensuring cybersecurity measures are in place to protect sensitive patient data. Additionally, there might be resistance from stakeholders who are hesitant to abandon familiar processes for unproven alternatives.


Despite these hurdles, the opportunities presented by next-generation coding technologies are substantial. At the forefront is enhanced accuracy in medical records. Advanced algorithms can process vast amounts of data quickly and accurately, reducing human error associated with manual entry. This precision ensures that patients receive appropriate treatments and insurance claims are processed correctly, ultimately improving patient outcomes and streamlining administrative tasks.


Another significant opportunity lies in predictive analytics facilitated by cutting-edge coding systems. By analyzing historical data patterns, these technologies can help identify potential health trends or outbreaks before they become critical issues. This proactive approach enables healthcare providers to allocate resources more effectively and devise strategies for prevention rather than merely reaction.


Furthermore, next-generation coding technologies have the potential to facilitate personalized medicine on a broader scale. With improved data collection and analysis capabilities, physicians can tailor treatments based on individual genetic profiles or specific health histories more efficiently than ever before.


In conclusion, while challenges exist in adopting next-generation medical coding technologies-ranging from training requirements to infrastructural investments-the opportunities they present for improving accuracy, efficiency, predictive capabilities, and personalized care are compelling incentives for their integration into future medical systems. As these technologies continue to advance, they hold promise not just for enhancing operational aspects of healthcare but also for fundamentally transforming patient care in ways previously unimaginable. Embracing this change requires collaboration across sectors-educational institutions must prepare future coders; governments should consider supporting transitions through subsidies or incentives; organizations need strategic planning-and above all else: an unwavering commitment toward innovation that prioritizes patient wellbeing at its core.

A chart of accounts (COA) is a list of financial accounts and reference numbers, grouped into categories, such as assets, liabilities, equity, revenue and expenses, and used for recording transactions in the organization's general ledger. Accounts may be associated with an identifier (account number) and a caption or header and are coded by account type. In computerized accounting systems with computable quantity accounting, the accounts can have a quantity measure definition. Account numbers may consist of numerical, alphabetic, or alpha-numeric characters, although in many computerized environments, like the SIE format, only numerical identifiers are allowed. The structure and headings of accounts should assist in consistent posting of transactions. Each nominal ledger account is unique, which allows its ledger to be located. The accounts are typically arranged in the order of the customary appearance of accounts in the financial statements: balance sheet accounts followed by profit and loss accounts.

The charts of accounts can be picked from a standard chart of accounts, like the BAS in Sweden. In some countries, charts of accounts are defined by the accountant from a standard general layouts or as regulated by law. However, in most countries it is entirely up to each accountant to design the chart of accounts.

Administration

[edit]

A chart of accounts is usually created for an organization by an accountant and available for use by the bookkeeper.

Each account in the chart of accounts is typically assigned a name. Accounts may also be assigned a unique account number by which the account can be identified. Account numbers may be structured to suit the needs of an organization, such as digit/s representing a division of the company, a department, the type of account, etc. The first digit might, for example, signify the type of account (asset, liability, etc.). In accounting software, using the account number may be a more rapid way to post to an account, and allows accounts to be presented in numeric order rather than alphabetic order.

Accounts are used in the generation of a trial balance, a list of the active general ledger accounts with their respective debit and credit balances used to test the completeness of a set of accounts: if the debit and credit totals match, the indication is that the accounts are being correctly maintained. However, a balanced trial balance does not guarantee that there are no errors in the individual ledger entries.

Accounts may be added to the chart of accounts as needed; they would not generally be removed, especially if any transaction had been posted to the account or if there is a non-zero balance.

International aspects and accounting information interchange – Charts of accounts and tax harmonisation issues

[edit]

While some countries define standard national charts of accounts (for example France and Germany) others such as the United States and United Kingdom do not. In the European Union, most countries codify a national GAAP (consistent with the EU accounting directives) and also require IFRS (as outlined by the IAS regulation) for public companies. The former often define a chart of accounts while the latter does not. The European Commission has spent a great deal of effort on administrative tax harmonisation, and this harmonization is the main focus of the latest version of the EU VAT directive, which aims to achieve better harmonization and support electronic trade documents, such as electronic invoices used in cross border trade, especially within the European Union Value Added Tax Area. However, since national GAAPs often serve as the basis for determining income tax, and since income tax law is reserved for the member states, no single uniform EU chart of accounts exists.

Types of accounts

[edit]

There are various types of accounts:[1]

  1. Asset accounts are used to identify assets. An asset is a present right of an entity to an economic benefit (CF [2] E16). Common examples of asset accounts include cash on hand, cash in bank, receivables, inventory, pre-paid expenses, land, structures, equipment, patents, copyrights, licenses, etc. Goodwill is different from other assets in that it is not used in operations and cannot be sold, licensed or otherwise transferred.
  2. Liability accounts are used to recognize liabilities. A liability is a present obligation of an entity to transfer an economic benefit (CF E37). Common examples of liability accounts include accounts payable, deferred revenue, bank loans, bonds payable and lease obligations.
  3. Equity accounts are used to recognize ownership equity. The terms equity [for profit enterprise] or net assets [not-for-profit enterprise] represent the residual interest in the assets of an entity that remains after deducting its liabilities (CF E61). Equity accounts include common stock, paid-in capital, and retained earnings. Equity accounts can vary depending where an entity is domiciled as some jurisdictions require entities to keep various sub-classifications of equity in separate accounts.
  4. Revenue accounts are used to recognize revenue. Revenues are inflows or other enhancements of assets of an entity or settlements of its liabilities (or a combination of both) from delivering or producing goods, rendering services, or carrying out other activities (CF E80).
  5. Expense accounts are used to recognize expenses. Expenses are outflows or other using up of assets of an entity or incurrences of its liabilities (or a combination of both) from delivering or producing goods, rendering services, or carrying out other activities (CF E81).
  6. Gain accounts are used to recognize gains. Gains are increases in equity (net assets) from transactions and other events and circumstances affecting an entity except those that result from revenues or investments by owners (CF E82). In practice, changes in the market value of assets (positive) or liabilities (negative) are recognized as gains while, for example, interest, dividends, rent or royalties received are recognized as other revenue.
  7. Loss accounts are used to recognize losses. Losses are decreases in equity (net assets) from transactions and other events and circumstances affecting an entity except those that result from expenses or distributions to owners (CF E83). In practice, changes in the market value of assets (negative) or liabilities (positive) are recognized as losses while, for example, interest or charitable contributions are recognized as other expenses.
  8. Income is the term generally used when referring to revenue and gains together. A separate term for the aggregation of expenses and losses does not exist.
  9. Contra-accounts are accounts with negative balances that offset other balance sheet accounts. Examples are accumulated depreciation (offset against fixed assets), and the allowance for bad debts (offset against accounts receivable). Deferred interest is also offset against receivables rather than being classified as a liability. Contra accounts are also often referred to as adjustments or adjusting accounts.

Example Chart of Accounts

[edit]

Sample Chart of Accounts

[edit]

A chart of accounts compatible with IFRS and US GAAP includes balance sheet (assets, liabilities and equity) and the profit and loss (revenue, expenses, gains and losses) classifications. If used by a consolidated or combined entity, it also includes separate classifications for intercompany transactions and balances.

Account Number—Account Title[3]—Balance: Debit (Dr) / Credit (Cr)

1.0.0 Assets (Dr)

  • 1.1.0 Cash And Financial Assets (Dr)
    • 1.1.1 Cash and Cash Equivalents (Dr)
    • 1.1.2 Financial Assets (Investments) (Dr)
    • 1.1.3 Restricted Cash and Financial Assets (Dr)
    • 1.1.4 Additional Financial Assets and Investments (Dr)
  • 1.2.0 Receivables And Contracts (Dr)
    • 1.2.1 Accounts, Notes And Loans Receivable (Dr)
    • 1.2.2 Contracts (Dr)
    • 1.2.3 Nontrade And Other Receivables (Dr)
  • 1.3.0 Inventory (Dr)
    • 1.3.1 Merchandise (Dr)
    • 1.3.2 Raw Material, Parts And Supplies (Dr)
    • 1.3.3 Work In Process (Dr)
    • 1.3.4 Finished Goods (Dr)
    • 1.3.5 Other Inventory (Dr)
  • 1.4.0 Accruals And Additional Assets (Dr)
    • 1.4.1 Prepaid Expense (Dr)
    • 1.4.2 Accrued Income (Dr)
    • 1.4.3 Additional Assets (Dr)
  • 1.5.0 Property, Plant And Equipment (Dr)
    • 1.5.1 Land And Land Improvements (Dr)
    • 1.5.2 Buildings, Structures And Improvements (Dr)
    • 1.5.3 Machinery And Equipment (Dr)
    • 1.5.4 Furniture And Fixtures (Dr)
    • 1.5.5 Right Of Use Assets (Classified As PP&E) (Dr)
    • 1.5.6 Other Property, Plant And Equipment (Dr)
    • 1.5.7 Construction In Progress (Dr)
  • 1.6.0 Property, Plant And Equipment Accumulated Depreciation And Depletion (Cr)
    • 1.6.1 Accumulated Depletion (Cr)
    • 1.6.2 Accumulated Depreciation (Cr)
  • 1.7.0 Intangible Assets (Excluding Goodwill) (Dr)
    • 1.7.1 Intellectual Property (Dr)
    • 1.7.2 Computer Software (Dr)
    • 1.7.3 Trade And Distribution Assets (Dr)
    • 1.7.4 Contracts And Rights (Dr)
    • 1.7.5 Right Of Use Assets (Dr)
    • 1.7.6 Crypto Assets (Dr)
    • 1.7.7 Other Intangible Assets (Dr)
    • 1.7.8 Acquisition In Progress (Dr)
  • 1.8.0 Intangible Assets Accumulated Amortization (Cr)
  • 1.9.0 Goodwill (Dr)

2.0.0 Liabilities (Cr)

  • 2.1.0 Payables (Cr)
    • 2.1.1 Trade Payables (Cr)
    • 2.1.2 Dividends Payable (Cr)
    • 2.1.3 Interest Payable (Cr)
    • 2.1.4 Other Payables (Cr)
  • 2.2.0 Accruals And Other Liabilities (Cr)
    • 2.2.1 Accrued Expenses (Including Payroll) (Cr)
    • 2.2.2 Deferred Income (Unearned Revenue) (Cr)
    • 2.2.3 Accrued Taxes (Other Than Payroll) (Cr)
    • 2.2.4 Other (Non-Financial) Liabilities (Cr)
  • 2.3.0 Financial Liabilities (Cr)
    • 2.3.1 Notes Payable (Cr)
    • 2.3.2 Loans Payable (Cr)
    • 2.3.3 Bonds (Debentures) (Cr)
    • 2.3.4 Other Debts And Borrowings (Cr)
    • 2.3.5 Lease Obligations (Cr)
    • 2.3.6 Derivative Financial Liabilities (Cr)
    • 2.3.7 Other Financial Liabilities (Cr)
  • 2.4.0 Provisions (Contingencies) (Cr)
    • 2.4.1 Customer Related Provisions (Cr)
    • 2.4.2 Ligation And Regulatory Provisions (Cr)
    • 2.4.3 Other Provisions (Cr)

3.0.0 Equity (Cr)

  • 3.1.0 Owners Equity (Attributable To Owners Of Parent) (Cr)
    • 3.1.1 Equity At par (Issued Capital) (Cr)
    • 3.1.2 Additional Paid-in Capital (Cr)
  • 3.2.0 Retained Earnings (Dr / Cr)
    • 3.2.1 Appropriated (Cr)
    • 3.2.2 Unappropriated (Cr)
    • 3.2.3 Deficit (Dr)
    • 3.2.4 In Suspense Zero
  • 3.3.0 Accumulated OCI (Dr / Cr)
    • 3.3.1 Exchange Differences On Translation (Dr / Cr)
    • 3.3.2 Cash Flow Hedges (Dr / Cr)
    • 3.3.3 Gains And Losses On Remeasuring Available-For-Sale Investments (Dr / Cr)
    • 3.3.4 Remeasurements Of Defined Benefit Plans (Dr / Cr)
    • 3.3.5 Revaluation Surplus (IFRS only) (Cr)
  • 3.4.0 Other Equity Items (Dr / Cr)
    • 3.4.1 ESOP Related Items (Dr / Cr)
    • 3.4.2 Subscribed Stock Receivables (Dr)
    • 3.4.3 Treasury Stock (Not Extinguished) (Dr)
    • 3.4.4 Miscellaneous Equity (Cr)
  • 3.5.0 Noncontrolling (Minority) Interest (Cr)

4.0.0 Revenue (Cr)

  • 4.1.0 Recognized Point Of Time (Cr)
    • 4.1.1 Goods (Cr)
    • 4.1.2 Services (Cr)
  • 4.2.0 Recognized Over Time (Cr)
    • 4.2.1 Products (Cr)
    • 4.2.2 Services (Cr)
  • 4.3.0 Adjustments (Dr)
    • 4.3.1 Variable Consideration (Dr)
    • 4.3.2 Consideration Paid (Payable) To Customers (Dr)
    • 4.3.3 Other Adjustments (Dr)

5.0.0 Expenses (Dr)

  • 5.1.0 Expenses Classified By Nature (Dr)
    • 5.1.1 Merchandise, Material, Parts And Supplies (Dr)
    • 5.1.2 Employee Benefits (Dr)
    • 5.1.3 Services (Dr)
    • 5.1.4 Rent, Depreciation, Amortization And Depletion (Dr)
    • 5.1.5 Increase (Decrease) In Inventories Of Finished Goods And Work In Progress (Dr / Cr)
    • 5.1.6 Other Work Performed By Entity And Capitalized (Cr)
  • 5.2.0 Expenses Classified By Function (Dr)
    • 5.2.1 Cost Of Sales (Dr)
    • 5.2.2 Selling, General And Administrative (Dr)
    • 5.2.3 Credit Loss (Reversal) On Receivables (Dr / Cr)

6.0.0 Other (Non-Operating) Income And Expenses (Dr / Cr)

  • 6.1.0 Other Revenue And Expenses (Dr / Cr)
    • 6.1.1 Other Revenue (Cr)
    • 6.1.2 Other Expenses (Dr)
  • 6.2.0 Gains And Losses (Dr / Cr)
    • 6.2.1 Foreign Currency Transaction Gain (Loss) (Dr / Cr)
    • 6.2.2 Gain (Loss) On Investments (Dr / Cr)
    • 6.2.3 Gain (Loss) On Derivatives (Dr / Cr)
    • 6.2.4 Crypto Asset Gain (Loss) (Dr / Cr)
    • 6.2.5 Gain (Loss) On Disposal Of Assets (Dr / Cr)
    • 6.2.6 Debt Related Gain (Loss) (Dr / Cr)
    • 6.2.7 Impairment Loss (Dr)
    • 6.2.8 Other Gains And Losses (Dr / Cr)
  • 6.3.0 Taxes (Other Than Income And Payroll) And Fees (Dr)
    • 6.3.1 Real Estate Taxes And Insurance (Dr)
    • 6.3.2 Highway (Road) Taxes And Tolls (Dr)
    • 6.3.3 Direct Tax And License Fees (Dr)
    • 6.3.4 Excise And Sales Taxes (Dr)
    • 6.3.5 Customs Fees And Duties (Not Classified As Sales Or Excise) (Dr)
    • 6.3.6 Non-Deductible VAT (GST) (Dr)
    • 6.3.7 General Insurance Expense (Dr)
    • 6.3.8 Administrative Fees (Revenue Stamps) (Dr)
    • 6.3.9 Fines And Penalties (Dr)
    • 6.3.10 Miscellaneous Taxes (Dr)
    • 6.3.11 Other Taxes And Fees (Dr)
  • 6.4.0 Income Tax Expense (Benefit) (Dr / Cr)

7.0.0 Intercompany And Related Party Accounts (Dr / Cr)

  • 7.1.0 Intercompany And Related Party Assets (Dr)
    • 7.1.1 Intercompany Balances (Eliminated In Consolidation) (Dr)
    • 7.1.2 Related Party Balances (Reported Or Disclosed) (Dr)
    • 7.1.3 Intercompany Investments (Dr)
  • 7.2.0 Intercompany And Related Party Liabilities (Cr)
    • 7.2.1 Intercompany Balances (Eliminated In Consolidation) (Cr)
    • 7.2.2 Related Party Balances (Reported Or Disclosed) (Cr)
  • 7.3.0 Intercompany And Related Party Income And Expense (Dr / Cr)
    • 7.3.1 Intercompany And Related Party Income (Cr)
    • 7.3.2 Intercompany And Related Party Expenses (Dr)
    • 7.3.3 Income (Loss) From Equity Method Investments (Dr)

French GAAP Chart of Accounts Layout

[edit]

The French generally accepted accounting principles chart of accounts layout is used in France, Belgium, Spain and many francophone countries. The use of the French GAAP chart of accounts layout (but not the detailed accounts) is stated in French law.

In France, liabilities and equity are seen as negative assets and not account types in themselves, just balance accounts.

Profit and Loss Accounts

[edit]
  • Class 6 Costs Accounts
  • Class 7 Revenues Accounts

Special Accounts

[edit]
  • Class 8 Special Accounts

Spanish GAAP Chart of Accounts Layout

[edit]

The Spanish generally accepted accounting principles chart of accounts layout is used in Spain. It is very similar to the French layout.

  • Class 3 Stocks Accounts
  • Class 4 Third-Party Accounts
  • Class 5 Bank & Cash

Profit and Loss Accounts

[edit]
  • Class 6 Costs Accounts
  • Class 7 Revenues Accounts

Special Accounts

[edit]
  • Class 8 Expenses Recognised In Equity
  • Class 9 Income Recognised In Equity

Swedish BAS chart of accounts layout

[edit]

The complete Swedish BAS standard chart of about 1250 accounts is also available in English and German texts in a printed publication from the non-profit branch BAS organisation. BAS is a private organisation originally created by the Swedish industry and today owned by a set general interest groups like, several industry organisations, several government authorities (incl GAAP and the revenue service), the Church of Sweden, the audits and accountants organisation and SIE (file format) organisation, as close as consensus possibly (a Swedish way of working without legal demands).

The BAS chart use is not legally required in Sweden. However, it is politically anchored and so well developed that it is commonly used.

The BAS chart is not an SIS national standard because SIS is organised on pay documentation and nobody in the computer world are paying for standard documents[citation needed]. BAS were SIS standard but left. SIS Swedish Standards Institute is the Swedish domestic member of ISO. This is not a government procurement problem due to the fact all significant governmental authorities are significant members/part owners of BAS.

An almost identical chart of accounts is used in Norway.

Balance Sheet Accounts

[edit]
Asset accounts
[edit]
  • 1150 Buildings and land assets
  • 1200 Inventories, Machines
  • 1210 Alterna
  • 1220 IngDirect Savings
  • 1230 Tangerine chequing
  • 1240 Account Receivable
Liability accounts
[edit]
  • 2300 Loans
  • 2400 Short debts (payables 2440)
  • 2500 Income Tax Payable
  • 2600 VAT Payable
  • 2700 Wages Payable
  • 2800-2999 other liabilities

Profit & Loss accounts

[edit]
Revenue accounts
[edit]
  • 3000 Revenue Accounts
Expense accounts
[edit]
  • 4000 Costs directly related to revenues
  • 5000-7999 General expense Accounts
  • 8000 Financial Accounts
  • 9000 Contra-accounts

See also

[edit]
  • General ledger
  • Financial statement
  • BAS Swedish standard chart of accounts, Version in English
  • French generally accepted accounting principles
  • Metadata, or "data about data." The Chart of accounts is in itself Metadata. It's a classification scheme that enables (intelligent) aggregation of individual financial transactions into coherent, and hopefully informative, financial statements.
  • XBRL eXtensible Business Reporting Language, and the related, required encoding (or "tagging") of public company financial statement data in the U.S. by the Securities and Exchange Commission. In those instances The Chart of accounts must support the required encodings.
  • Regulation S-X, Regulation S-K and Proxy statement In the U.S. the Securities and Exchange Commission prescribes and requires numerous quarterly and annual financial statement disclosures. A large portion of the required disclosures are numeric and must be supported by the Chart of accounts.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Understanding Asset, Liability, Equity, Income and Expenses | Part-3 Accounting Series". YouTube. 15 April 2022.
  2. ^ "Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 8, Chapter 4".
  3. ^ "Chart of Accounts | IFRS and US GAAP".

 

In general, compliance means conforming to a rule, such as a specification, policy, standard or law. Compliance has traditionally been explained by reference to deterrence theory, according to which punishing a behavior will decrease the violations both by the wrongdoer (specific deterrence) and by others (general deterrence). This view has been supported by economic theory, which has framed punishment in terms of costs and has explained compliance in terms of a cost-benefit equilibrium (Becker 1968). However, psychological research on motivation provides an alternative view: granting rewards (Deci, Koestner and Ryan, 1999) or imposing fines (Gneezy Rustichini 2000) for a certain behavior is a form of extrinsic motivation that weakens intrinsic motivation and ultimately undermines compliance.

Regulatory compliance describes the goal that organizations aspire to achieve in their efforts to ensure that they are aware of and take steps to comply with relevant laws, policies, and regulations.[1] Due to the increasing number of regulations and need for operational transparency, organizations are increasingly adopting the use of consolidated and harmonized sets of compliance controls.[2] This approach is used to ensure that all necessary governance requirements can be met without the unnecessary duplication of effort and activity from resources.

Regulations and accrediting organizations vary among fields, with examples such as PCI-DSS and GLBA in the financial industry, FISMA for U.S. federal agencies, HACCP for the food and beverage industry, and the Joint Commission and HIPAA in healthcare. In some cases other compliance frameworks (such as COBIT) or even standards (NIST) inform on how to comply with regulations.

Some organizations keep compliance data—all data belonging or pertaining to the enterprise or included in the law, which can be used for the purpose of implementing or validating compliance—in a separate store for meeting reporting requirements. Compliance software is increasingly being implemented to help companies manage their compliance data more efficiently. This store may include calculations, data transfers, and audit trails.[3][4]

Standards

[edit]

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and its ISO 37301:2021 (which deprecates ISO 19600:2014) standard is one of the primary international standards for how businesses handle regulatory compliance, providing a reminder of how compliance and risk should operate together, as "colleagues" sharing a common framework with some nuances to account for their differences. The ISO also produces international standards such as ISO/IEC 27002 to help organizations meet regulatory compliance with their security management and assurance best practices.[5]

Some local or international specialized organizations such as the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) also develop standards and regulation codes. They thereby provide a wide range of rules and directives to ensure compliance of the products to safety, security or design standards.[6]

By nation

[edit]

Regulatory compliance varies not only by industry but often by location. The financial, research, and pharmaceutical regulatory structures in one country, for example, may be similar but with particularly different nuances in another country. These similarities and differences are often a product "of reactions to the changing objectives and requirements in different countries, industries, and policy contexts".[7]

Australia

[edit]

Australia's major financial services regulators of deposits, insurance, and superannuation include the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC), and the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC).[8] These regulators help to ensure financial institutes meet their promises, that transactional information is well documented, and that competition is fair while protecting consumers. The APRA in particular deals with superannuation and its regulation, including new regulations requiring trustees of superannuation funds to demonstrate to APRA that they have adequate resources (human, technology and financial), risk management systems, and appropriate skills and expertise to manage the superannuation fund, with individuals running them being "fit and proper".[8]

Other key regulators in Australia include the Australian Communications & Media Authority (ACMA) for broadcasting, the internet, and communications;[9] the Clean Energy Regulator for "monitoring, facilitating and enforcing compliance with" energy and carbon emission schemes;[10] and the Therapeutic Goods Administration for drugs, devices, and biologics;[11]

Australian organisations seeking to remain compliant with various regulations may turn to AS ISO 19600:2015 (which supersedes AS 3806-2006). This standard helps organisations with compliance management, placing "emphasis on the organisational elements that are required to support compliance" while also recognizing the need for continual improvement.[12][13]

Canada

[edit]

In Canada, federal regulation of deposits, insurance, and superannuation is governed by two independent bodies: the OSFI through the Bank Act, and FINTRAC, mandated by the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act, 2001 (PCMLTFA).[14][15] These groups protect consumers, regulate how risk is controlled and managed, and investigate illegal action such as money laundering and terrorist financing.[14][15] On a provincial level, each province maintain individuals laws and agencies. Unlike any other major federation, Canada does not have a securities regulatory authority at the federal government level. The provincial and territorial regulators work together to coordinate and harmonize regulation of the Canadian capital markets through the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA).[16]

Other key regulators in Canada include the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) for food safety, animal health, and plant health; Health Canada for public health; and Environment and Climate Change Canada for environment and sustainable energy.[17]

Canadian organizations seeking to remain compliant with various regulations may turn to ISO 19600:2014, an international compliance standard that "provides guidance for establishing, developing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining and improving an effective and responsive compliance management system within an organization".[18] For more industry specific guidance, e.g., financial institutions, Canada's E-13 Regulatory Compliance Management provides specific compliance risk management tactics.[19]

The Netherlands

[edit]

The financial sector in the Netherlands is heavily regulated. The Dutch Central Bank (De Nederlandsche Bank N.V.) is the prudential regulator while the Netherlands Authority for Financial Markets (AFM) is the regulator for behavioral supervision of financial institutions and markets. A common definition of compliance is:'Observance of external (international and national) laws and regulations, as well as internal norms and procedures, to protect the integrity of the organization, its management and employees with the aim of preventing and controlling risks and the possible damage resulting from these compliance and integrity risks'.[20]

India

[edit]

In India, compliance regulation takes place across three strata: Central, State, and Local regulation. India veers towards central regulation, especially of financial organizations and foreign funds. Compliance regulations vary based on the industry segment in addition to the geographical mix. Most regulation comes in the following broad categories: economic regulation, regulation in the public interest, and environmental regulation.[21] India has also been characterized by poor compliance - reports suggest that only around 65% of companies are fully compliant to norms.[22]

Singapore

[edit]

The Monetary Authority of Singapore is Singapore's central bank and financial regulatory authority. It administers the various statutes pertaining to money, banking, insurance, securities and the financial sector in general, as well as currency issuance.[23]

United Kingdom

[edit]

There is considerable regulation in the United Kingdom, some of which is derived from European Union legislation. Various areas are policed by different bodies, such as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA),[24] Environment Agency,[25] Scottish Environment Protection Agency,[26] Information Commissioner's Office,[27] Care Quality Commission,[28] and others: see List of regulators in the United Kingdom.

Important compliance issues for all organizations large and small include the Data Protection Act 2018[29] and, for the public sector, Freedom of Information Act 2000.[30]

Financial compliance

[edit]

The U.K. Corporate Governance Code (formerly the Combined Code) is issued by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and "sets standards of good practice in relation to board leadership and effectiveness, remuneration, accountability, and relations with shareholders".[31] All companies with a Premium Listing of equity shares in the U.K. are required under the Listing Rules to report on how they have applied the Combined Code in their annual report and accounts.[32] (The Codes are therefore most similar to the U.S.' Sarbanes–Oxley Act.)

The U.K.'s regulatory framework requires that all its publicly listed companies should provide specific content in the core financial statements that must appear in a yearly report, including balance sheet, comprehensive income statement, and statement of changes in equity, as well as cash flow statement as required under international accounting standards.[33] It further demonstrates the relationship that subsists among shareholders, management, and the independent audit teams. Financial statements must be prepared using a particular set of rules and regulations hence the rationale behind allowing the companies to apply the provisions of company law, international financial reporting standards (IFRS), as well as the U.K. stock exchange rules as directed by the FCA.[34] It is also possible that shareholders may not understand the figures as presented in the various financial statements, hence it is critical that the board should provide notes on accounting policies as well as other explanatory notes to help them understand the report better.

Challenges

[edit]

Data retention is a part of regulatory compliance that is proving to be a challenge in many instances. The security that comes from compliance with industry regulations can seem contrary to maintaining user privacy. Data retention laws and regulations ask data owners and other service providers to retain extensive records of user activity beyond the time necessary for normal business operations. These requirements have been called into question by privacy rights advocates.[35]

Compliance in this area is becoming very difficult. Laws like the CAN-SPAM Act and Fair Credit Reporting Act in the U.S. require that businesses give people the right to be forgotten.[36][37] In other words, they must remove individuals from marketing lists if it is requested, tell them when and why they might share personal information with a third party, or at least ask permission before sharing that data. Now, with new laws coming out that demand longer data retention despite the individual’s desires, it can create some real difficulties.

Money laundering and terrorist financing pose significant threats to the integrity of the financial system and national security. To combat these threats, the EU has adopted a risk-based approach to Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) that relies on cooperation and coordination between EU and national authorities. In this context, risk-based regulation refers to the approach of identifying and assessing potential risks of money laundering and terrorist financing and implementing regulatory measures proportional to those risks. However, the shared enforcement powers between EU and national authorities in the implementation and enforcement of AML/CFT regulations can create legal implications and challenges. The potential for inconsistent application of AML regulations across different jurisdictions can create regulatory arbitrage and undermine the effectiveness of AML efforts. Additionally, a lack of clear and consistent legal frameworks defining the roles and responsibilities of EU and national authorities in AML enforcement can lead to situations where accountability is difficult to establish.

United States

[edit]

Corporate scandals and breakdowns such as the Enron case of reputational risk in 2001 have increased calls for stronger compliance and regulations, particularly for publicly listed companies.[1] The most significant recent statutory changes in this context have been the Sarbanes–Oxley Act developed by two U.S. congressmen, Senator Paul Sarbanes and Representative Michael Oxley in 2002 which defined significantly tighter personal responsibility of corporate top management for the accuracy of reported financial statements; and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is an agency of the United States Department of the Treasury under the auspices of the Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence. OFAC administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions based on U.S. foreign policy and national security goals against targeted foreign states, organizations, and individuals.

Compliance in the U.S. generally means compliance with laws and regulations. These laws and regulations can have criminal or civil penalties. The definition of what constitutes an effective compliance plan has been elusive. Most authors, however, continue to cite the guidance provided by the United States Sentencing Commission in Chapter 8 of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.[38][39]

On October 12, 2006, the U.S. Small Business Administration re-launched Business.gov (later Business.USA.gov and finally SBA.Gov)[40] which provides a single point of access to government services and information that help businesses comply with government regulations.

The U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) was created by Congress to assure safe and healthful working conditions for working men and women by setting and enforcing standards and by providing training, outreach, education, and assistance. OSHA implements laws and regulations regularly in the following areas, construction, maritime, agriculture, and recordkeeping.[41]

The United States Department of Transportation also has various laws and regulations requiring that prime contractors when bidding on federally funded projects engage in good faith effort compliance, meaning they must document their outreach to certified disadvantaged business enterprises.[42]

See also

[edit]
  • Business Motivation Model - A standard for recording governance and compliance activities
  • Chief compliance officer
  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Environmental compliance
  • Governance, risk management, and compliance
  • International regulation
  • Professional ethics
  • Regulatory technology

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Compliance, Technology, and Modern Finance, 11 Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law 159 (2016)
  2. ^ Silveira, P.; Rodriguez, C.; Birukou, A.; Casati, F.; Daniel, F.; D'Andrea, V.; Worledge, C.; Zouhair, T. (2012), "Aiding Compliance Governance in Service-Based Business Processes", Handbook of Research on Service-Oriented Systems and Non-Functional Properties (PDF), IGI Global, pp. 524–548, doi:10.4018/978-1-61350-432-1.ch022, hdl:11311/1029233, ISBN 9781613504321
  3. ^ Norris-Montanari, J. (27 February 2017). "Compliance – Where does it fit in a data strategy?". SAS Blogs. SAS Institute, Inc. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  4. ^ Monica, A.D.; Shilt, C.; Rimmerman, R.; et al. (2015). "Chapter 4: Monitoring software updates". Microsoft System Center Software Update Management Field Experience. Microsoft Press. pp. 57–82. ISBN 9780735695894.
  5. ^ Calder, A.; Watkins, S. (2015). IT Governance: An International Guide to Data Security and ISO 27001/ISO 27002. Kogan Page Publishers. pp. 39–40. ISBN 9780749474065.
  6. ^ Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspection According to ASME
  7. ^ Malyshev, N. (2008). "The Evolution of Regulatory Policy in OECD Countries" (PDF). OECD. Retrieved 27 July 2018.
  8. ^ a b Pearson, G. (2009). "Chapter 2: The regulatory structure". Financial Services Law and Compliance in Australia. Cambridge University Press. pp. 20–68. ISBN 9780521617840.
  9. ^ "Regulatory Responsibility". ACMA. 17 December 2012. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  10. ^ "What we do". Clean Energy Regulator. 14 December 2016. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  11. ^ Weinberg, S. (2011). "Chapter 13: International Regulation". Cost-Contained Regulatory Compliance: For the Pharmaceutical, Biologics, and Medical Device Industries. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 227–258. ISBN 9781118002278.
  12. ^ CompliSpace (14 April 2016). "Compliance Standards ISO 19600 and AS 3806 – Differences explained". Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  13. ^ "AS ISO 19600:2015". Standards Catalogue. Standards Australia. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  14. ^ a b International Monetary Fund; Financial Action Task Force (December 2008). Canada: Report on Observance of Standards and Codes - FATF Recommendations for Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism.cite book: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  15. ^ a b International Monetary Fund (August 2016). Canada: Detailed Assessment Report on Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism. International Monetary Fund. ISBN 9781475536188.
  16. ^ Lee, R. (2003). "Chapter 6: Promoting Regional Capital Market Integration". In Dowers, K.; Msci, P. (eds.). Focus on Capital: New Approaches to Developing Latin American Capital Markets. Inter-American Development Bank. p. 168. ISBN 9781931003490.
  17. ^ Smyth, S.J.; McHughen, A. (2012). "Chapter 2: Regulation of Genetically Modified Crops in USA and Canada: Canadian Overview". In Wozniak, C.A.; McHughen, A. (eds.). Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology: The United States and Canada. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 15–34. ISBN 9789400721562.
  18. ^ International Organization for Standardization (December 2014). "ISO 19600:2014". Standards Catalogue. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  19. ^ Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (14 November 2014). "Revised Guideline E-13 – Regulatory Compliance Management (RCM)". Government of Canada. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  20. ^ The Handbook of Compliance & Integrity Management. Theory & Practice, Prof. S.C. Bleker-van Eyk & R.A.M. Houben (Eds.), 2017 Kluwer Law International.
  21. ^ "Regulatory Management and Reform in India" (PDF). OECD.
  22. ^ "India Inc has poor record in regulatory compliance | Latest News & Updates at Daily News & Analysis". 2014-10-12. Retrieved 2016-09-18.
  23. ^ "Who We Are". www.mas.gov.sg. Retrieved 2024-08-19.
  24. ^ "Do you need to be FCA authorsied? | FCA application process". Harper James. Retrieved 2024-08-19.
  25. ^ "Check if you need an environmental permit". GOV.UK. 2020-10-23. Retrieved 2024-08-19.
  26. ^ "Waste management licence (Scotland) - GOV.UK". www.gov.uk. Retrieved 2024-08-19.
  27. ^ "Information Commissioner's Office". GOV.UK. 2021-06-28. Retrieved 2024-08-19.
  28. ^ "Care Quality Commission". GOV.UK. 2024-06-25. Retrieved 2024-08-19.
  29. ^ "Data Protection Act 2018". August 19, 2024.
  30. ^ "Freedom of Information Act 2000". August 19, 2024.
  31. ^ "UK Corporate Governance Code". Financial Reporting Council. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  32. ^ "LR 1.5 Standard and Premium Listing". FCA Handbook. Financial Conduct Authority. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  33. ^ "LR 9.8 Annual financial report". FCA Handbook. Financial Conduct Authority. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  34. ^ "FCA Handbook". Financial Conduct Authority. Retrieved 31 July 2018.
  35. ^ "Compliance Challenge: Privacy vs. Security". Dell.com. Archived from the original on 2011-02-26. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  36. ^ Francis, L.P.; Francis, J.G. (2017). Privacy: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press. p. PT102. ISBN 9780190612283.
  37. ^ Dale, N.; Lewis, J. (2015). Computer Science Illuminated. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. p. 388. ISBN 9781284055924.
  38. ^ "Special Reports and Discussions on Chapter Eight". USSC.gov. Archived from the original on November 23, 2010.
  39. ^ The Ethics and Compliance Initiative (ECI). "Principles and Practices of High Quality Ethics & Compliance Programs". pp. 12–13. Retrieved 31 August 2016.
  40. ^ "Explore Business Tools & Resources". Business.USA.gov.
  41. ^ "OSHA Law & Regulations | Occupational Safety and Health Administration". www.osha.gov. Retrieved 2017-04-07.
  42. ^ "Compliance with Diversity Goals Remain Lacking". Archived from the original on June 3, 2024.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning is expected to revolutionize medical coding by automating routine tasks, improving accuracy, and enhancing data analysis capabilities. Additionally, blockchain technology might be used for secure and transparent health data management.
The transition from ICD-10 to ICD-11 will streamline global healthcare reporting by offering more detailed and flexible codes that better reflect current medical knowledge. This shift is anticipated to improve interoperability across international health systems and enhance the precision of health data analytics.
Interoperability will be crucial for ensuring seamless communication between different healthcare systems, facilitating efficient data exchange, and reducing redundancy. Improved interoperability among electronic health records (EHRs) will enable more accurate and comprehensive patient information sharing.
Regulatory changes could mandate updates in coding standards to accommodate emerging healthcare trends like telemedicine or personalized medicine. Compliance with new regulations would require coders to stay informed about policy shifts and adapt quickly to maintain accurate documentation practices.