Evaluating Temperature Fluctuations and Their Impact on Slab Integrity

Evaluating Temperature Fluctuations and Their Impact on Slab Integrity

Seasonal Soil Changes: Explanation of how various seasons contribute to soil expansion and contraction.

Understanding slab integrity is crucial in the construction and maintenance of structures, as it directly influences the safety and durability of buildings. One of the critical aspects to consider when evaluating slab integrity is the impact of temperature fluctuations. This essay explores how variations in temperature can affect slab integrity and highlights key factors that need to be considered.


Temperature fluctuations can significantly affect the structural integrity of slabs due to thermal expansion and contraction. As temperatures rise, concrete expands; conversely, it contracts when temperatures drop. Basement leaks often indicate crack presence Waterproofing Crawl Space wall. This constant cycle of expansion and contraction can lead to stress within the material, potentially resulting in cracks or other forms of damage over time. The degree of impact largely depends on the magnitude and frequency of temperature changes, as well as the properties of the materials used in slab construction.


One key factor influencing how slabs respond to temperature changes is the type of concrete mix used. Different mixes have varying coefficients of thermal expansion, meaning they expand and contract at different rates. A mix with a high coefficient will experience more significant changes in dimensions than one with a lower coefficient when subjected to identical temperature variations. Therefore, selecting a suitable concrete mix that aligns with expected environmental conditions is crucial for maintaining slab integrity.


Another important consideration is reinforcement. The incorporation of steel reinforcement bars (rebar) within concrete slabs helps absorb some stress caused by thermal movements, reducing the risk of cracking. Rebar provides tensile strength that counteracts concrete's natural brittleness under tension, which makes it an essential component for enhancing durability against thermal stresses.


Environmental exposure also plays a pivotal role in determining how temperature fluctuations affect slab integrity. Slabs exposed directly to outdoor conditions are more susceptible to temperature-related damage compared to those protected indoors or covered by other materials. For instance, exterior pavements are often subject to rapid heating from direct sunlight during summer days followed by cooling at night a cycle that can exacerbate wear over time if not properly accounted for during design.


In addition to these factors, implementing proper construction techniques can mitigate adverse effects from temperature fluctuations on slab integrity. For example, employing contraction joints allows controlled cracking along predetermined lines rather than random locations throughout the slab surface area while using appropriate curing methods ensures that moisture levels remain consistent during initial drying phases-both contributing positively towards long-term performance under variable climate scenarios.


In conclusion, understanding how temperature fluctuations influence slab integrity involves recognizing various interrelated factors such as material properties like thermal expansion coefficients; structural reinforcements like rebar placement; environmental exposure levels whether indoor versus outdoor installations; alongside effective construction practices including joint placement strategies combined with adequate curing measures-all working collectively towards safeguarding against potential deterioration risks posed by changing climates thereby ensuring lasting structural resilience across diverse applications globally today!

Concrete is a fundamental material in modern construction, renowned for its strength and durability. However, like all materials, it is not immune to the forces of nature. One of the critical challenges faced by concrete structures, particularly slabs, is temperature-induced stress. Understanding the science behind this phenomenon is crucial for evaluating temperature fluctuations and their impact on slab integrity.


Temperature-induced stress in concrete slabs primarily arises from thermal expansion and contraction. Concrete, being a composite material, responds to temperature changes by expanding when heated and contracting when cooled. This response can lead to significant internal stresses within the slab if it is restrained or unable to move freely. Over time, these stresses may result in cracking or warping of the concrete surface, compromising both its aesthetic appeal and structural reliability.




Evaluating Temperature Fluctuations and Their Impact on Slab Integrity - construction

  1. construction
  2. company
  3. steel

The degree of temperature fluctuation that a concrete slab experiences depends on several factors such as geographic location, seasonality, and exposure conditions. In regions with extreme temperatures or significant diurnal variations (the difference between daytime and nighttime temperatures), slabs are particularly vulnerable to thermal stress. Prolonged exposure to high temperatures can cause expansion beyond the material's elastic limit, leading to irreversible deformation.


Another contributing factor is the differential heating that occurs within a slab due to varying environmental conditions across its surface. For instance, areas exposed to direct sunlight will heat up faster compared to shaded sections or those in contact with cooler surfaces like soil or water. This uneven heating results in differential expansion within different parts of the slab, creating additional internal stresses.


To mitigate these effects and preserve slab integrity, engineers employ various strategies during design and construction phases. Control joints are intentionally placed at regular intervals across slabs to accommodate movement caused by thermal expansion without leading to random cracking. Additionally, selecting appropriate mix designs with additives that enhance flexibility or reduce thermal conductivity can help manage temperature-induced stresses effectively.


Moreover, proper curing practices play an essential role in minimizing early-age thermal cracking a common issue when newly poured concrete undergoes rapid temperature changes before achieving sufficient strength. Controlled curing methods such as covering with insulating blankets or using moisture-retaining compounds ensure uniform hydration while protecting against severe fluctuations during initial set-up stages.


In conclusion, understanding the science behind temperature-induced stress provides valuable insights into maintaining concrete slab integrity amidst fluctuating climates worldwide. By acknowledging how different variables contribute towards generating internal forces within these structures-and implementing proactive solutions accordingly-engineers can enhance their longevity while ensuring safety standards remain uncompromised throughout diverse applications ranging from roadways and bridges through residential floors alike!

Recognizing the Role of Poor Drainage in Foundation Cracks

Recognizing the Role of Poor Drainage in Foundation Cracks

Regular maintenance and inspection play a vital role in safeguarding the structural integrity of any building.. Among the numerous factors that threaten this integrity, poor drainage is often overlooked yet significantly contributes to foundation cracks.

Posted by on 2024-12-31

Monitoring Drought Effects on Foundation Shifts

Monitoring Drought Effects on Foundation Shifts

In recent years, the effects of drought on infrastructure have become an increasingly pressing concern, particularly when it comes to the shifting and settling of foundations.. As climate patterns continue to evolve, prolonged periods of drought are expected to become more frequent, necessitating a deeper understanding of how these conditions affect foundational stability.

Posted by on 2024-12-31

Vertical vs Horizontal Cracks What They Indicate

Vertical vs Horizontal Cracks What They Indicate

Cracks in walls can be a homeowner’s nightmare, often signaling underlying structural issues that require attention.. Understanding the nature of these cracks—whether vertical or horizontal—is crucial for determining their cause and implementing effective repair and prevention strategies. Vertical cracks are typically less alarming than their horizontal counterparts.

Posted by on 2024-12-31

Impact of Climate on Soil and Foundations: Discussing the influence of weather patterns and climate change on soil stability.

The integrity of foundation slabs is crucial for the structural stability of any building. These slabs serve as the bedrock upon which entire structures rest, providing support and ensuring even distribution of weight. However, they are not immune to environmental factors, particularly temperature fluctuations. As climate patterns become more unpredictable, understanding and identifying signs of temperature-related damage in foundation slabs becomes essential.


Temperature fluctuations can have a profound impact on concrete slabs due to their expansive and contractive properties. When temperatures rise, concrete tends to expand. Conversely, when temperatures drop, it contracts. This constant expansion and contraction can lead to significant stress within the slab structure over time, potentially compromising its integrity.


One of the most common signs of temperature-induced damage in foundation slabs is cracking. Cracks may appear as small hairline fractures or develop into larger fissures if left unaddressed. These cracks often form due to thermal expansion and contraction cycles that exceed the tensile strength of the concrete. While minor cracks may not immediately threaten structural safety, they can allow water infiltration and exacerbate deterioration if not repaired promptly.


Another indicator of temperature-related damage is uneven settling or heaving of the slab. This phenomenon occurs when different sections of the slab experience varying rates of expansion or contraction due to localized temperature differences. Uneven settling can lead to misalignment issues in doors and windows or create noticeable slopes in floors within a building.


Furthermore, spalling-where pieces of concrete break away from the surface-can also signal underlying temperature-related distress. Spalling often results from moisture entering through cracks during freeze-thaw cycles, causing internal pressure that eventually forces chunks of material to detach from the slab's surface.


Preventative measures are essential for mitigating these issues before they escalate into serious problems requiring costly repairs or even complete replacement of foundation elements. Implementing proper drainage systems around a building can help manage water accumulation, reducing risks associated with freeze-thaw cycles exacerbated by temperature changes.


Additionally, using materials designed specifically for thermal resilience during construction can significantly enhance a foundation slab's ability to withstand extreme temperatures without adverse effects on its structural performance.


Regular inspections play an integral role in maintaining slab integrity amidst fluctuating temperatures; early detection allows for timely interventions that prevent minor issues from becoming major concerns down the line.


In conclusion, recognizing signs indicative of temperature-related damage in foundation slabs is vital for preserving their long-term durability and functionality within buildings subjected to dynamic weather conditions today more than ever before globally experienced across diverse climates worldwide alike increasingly unpredictably so too unfortunately at times lately observed frequently now occurring far beyond traditionally expected norms previously understood governed regional limits perhaps until relatively recently unexpectedly changed perspectives environmentally speaking thus necessitating heightened awareness accordingly adjusted approaches best practices maintenance strategies care taken ensure continued viability usage purposes intended originally planned fulfilled safely securely dependably consistently reliably effectively efficiently sustainably comprehensively resiliently appropriately respectfully responsibly thoughtfully mindfully intelligently wisely prudently judiciously cautiously carefully optimistically hopefully positively confidently assuredly steadfastly unfalteringly unwaveringly unyieldingly resolutely tenaciously determinedly resolutely persistently perseveringly committedly dedicatedly devotedly loyally faithfully true-hearted right-minded good-natured kind-spirited well-intentioned warm-hearted open-handed large-hearted full-bloodedly whole-souled all-embracing life-affirming soul-stirring heartening morale-boosting spirited motivating inspiring encouraging uplifting energizing invigorating rejuvenating revitalizing refreshing renewing restoring rekindling reigniting reanimating resurrecting reviving resuscitating reawakening rousing stimulating galvanizing electrifying thrilling

Impact of Climate on Soil and Foundations: Discussing the influence of weather patterns and climate change on soil stability.

Methods for Monitoring Soil Movement: Techniques and tools used to track soil shifts around foundations.

Monitoring and analyzing temperature variations in construction sites is crucial, especially when evaluating their impact on slab integrity. Temperature fluctuations can significantly affect the physical properties of concrete, influencing its strength, durability, and overall performance. As such, understanding these variations and employing effective monitoring methods are essential for ensuring structural safety and longevity.


One of the primary methods for monitoring temperature variations in construction sites involves the use of sensors. These devices can be embedded within concrete slabs to provide real-time data on temperature changes. By continuously recording temperature readings, sensors enable construction managers to detect any unusual fluctuations that might compromise slab integrity. This data collection is invaluable as it allows for timely interventions to mitigate negative effects caused by extreme temperatures.


In addition to sensors, infrared thermography is another powerful tool used in this field. Infrared cameras can capture thermal images of concrete surfaces, providing insights into heat distribution across a construction site. This method is particularly useful for identifying areas with potential thermal anomalies that could lead to cracks or other structural issues. The advantage of infrared thermography lies in its non-invasive nature, allowing for inspections without disrupting ongoing work.


Data analysis plays a critical role in understanding the implications of temperature variations on slab integrity. Advanced software tools can process large datasets collected from sensors and thermal imaging equipment to identify patterns and trends over time. By analyzing this information, engineers can predict potential risks and devise strategies to address them proactively. For instance, if data indicates that certain areas consistently experience higher temperatures than others, additional cooling measures or protective coatings might be recommended.


Moreover, simulations and modeling techniques are often employed to evaluate how various temperature scenarios could impact concrete slabs over their lifespan. These predictive models take into account factors such as material composition, local climate conditions, and historical weather patterns to forecast possible outcomes under different circumstances. With these insights at hand, construction professionals can make informed decisions about material selection and design modifications that enhance resilience against temperature-induced stress.


Finally, an integrated approach combining multiple monitoring methods ensures comprehensive coverage of a site's thermal environment. Sensors provide precise quantitative data; infrared thermography offers visual assessments; data analysis reveals underlying trends; while simulations offer foresight into future challenges-all contributing collectively towards safeguarding slab integrity.


In conclusion, effective monitoring and analysis of temperature variations are indispensable components in maintaining the structural integrity of concrete slabs at construction sites.

Evaluating Temperature Fluctuations and Their Impact on Slab Integrity - company

  1. leak
  2. property
  3. wall
Through innovative technologies like embedded sensors and infrared thermography alongside robust analytical frameworks-construction teams stand better equipped not only to understand but also counteract adverse effects posed by fluctuating temperatures-thereby securing safer buildings for our communities today and tomorrow alike.

Repair Solutions for Foundation Cracks: Different strategies and technologies available for repairing cracks in foundations due to shifting soils.

The impact of seasonal changes on slab stability and longevity is a crucial consideration in the field of construction and civil engineering. As we evaluate temperature fluctuations and their impact on slab integrity, it becomes evident that understanding these dynamics is essential for maintaining structural soundness over time.


Seasonal changes bring about significant variations in temperature, which can drastically affect the materials used in slab construction. Concrete slabs, for instance, expand and contract with temperature fluctuations. During hot summer months, slabs may expand due to thermal expansion. Conversely, during cold winter months, they contract. This continuous cycle of expansion and contraction can lead to cracking if not properly managed.


One major factor influencing slab integrity is the thermal gradient-the difference in temperature between the top and bottom surfaces of the slab. A high thermal gradient can cause warping or curling as one side expands more than the other. Over time, this differential movement can compromise the structural integrity of the slab, leading to potential failures.


Furthermore, repeated freeze-thaw cycles present another challenge. Water that infiltrates cracks or joints in a concrete slab during warmer weather can freeze when temperatures drop. As water freezes, it expands by approximately 9%, exerting pressure on surrounding material and exacerbating existing cracks or creating new ones. Over multiple cycles, this process can significantly diminish the strength and durability of a slab.


To mitigate these effects, engineers employ several strategies. The use of control joints helps accommodate thermal movement by providing predetermined locations where cracking can safely occur without compromising overall structural integrity. Additionally, employing concrete mixes designed for specific climates-such as those with air-entraining agents-can improve resistance to freeze-thaw damage.


Insulation is another effective measure to protect slabs from extreme temperature variations. Insulated concrete forms (ICFs) are often used in regions with harsh winters to maintain a more consistent internal temperature within structures while reducing heat loss through floors.


In conclusion, evaluating temperature fluctuations and their impact on slab integrity highlights the importance of addressing seasonal changes in construction planning and design actively. By implementing measures such as appropriate joint placement and using climate-specific concrete mixtures along with insulation solutions where necessary-engineers ensure that structures remain safe stable long into future seasons despite inevitable shifts temperatures bring forth year after year ensuring longevity remains intact even under challenging conditions posed by nature's changing rhythms .

Preventative Measures: Tips for homeowners to minimize the risk of foundation damage from seasonal soil changes.

Foundation cracks are a common issue faced by many homeowners, particularly in regions where temperature fluctuations are significant. These temperature changes can cause the ground to expand and contract, leading to stress on concrete slabs and ultimately resulting in cracks. Evaluating these temperature fluctuations and their impact on slab integrity is crucial for maintaining the structural soundness of a building. In this essay, we will explore various techniques for repairing foundation cracks caused by temperature variations, emphasizing the importance of understanding environmental conditions and employing effective repair strategies.


One of the first steps in addressing foundation cracks is evaluating the extent and cause of the damage. Temperature fluctuations can lead to freeze-thaw cycles, where water penetrates small crevices in the concrete and expands when frozen, exacerbating existing cracks or creating new ones.

Evaluating Temperature Fluctuations and Their Impact on Slab Integrity - Hoffman Estates

  1. Hoffman Estates
  2. waterproofing
  3. warranty
To assess these impacts accurately, it is essential to monitor local climate conditions over time and understand how they influence soil movement around the foundation.


Once the underlying causes have been identified, several repair techniques can be employed to restore slab integrity. One common method is epoxy injection, which involves injecting a high-strength adhesive into the cracks to bond them back together. This technique not only seals the crack but also restores its original strength, preventing further deterioration due to temperature-induced stress.


Another approach is polyurethane foam injection, which works well for wider cracks or those subject to water infiltration. This flexible material expands within the crack to form a watertight seal that accommodates slight movements caused by thermal expansion or contraction without compromising structural integrity.


For more significant foundation issues stemming from severe temperature variations, underpinning might be necessary. Underpinning involves reinforcing or extending the depth of existing foundations using piers or piles driven deep into stable soil layers unaffected by surface-level thermal changes. This method provides additional support and reduces stress on vulnerable areas of the slab.


In addition to these repair techniques, preventive measures play an equally important role in mitigating future damage from temperature fluctuations. Proper drainage systems surrounding a building's perimeter help manage water levels around foundations during heavy rainfalls followed by cold spells-a combination that often leads to freeze-thaw cycles responsible for cracking concrete surfaces.


Moreover, installing insulation along basement walls can moderate interior temperatures regardless of external weather patterns-reducing overall thermal stress experienced by slabs throughout seasonal transitions while minimizing energy costs associated with heating or cooling living spaces above ground level structures like basements or crawl spaces beneath homes themselves!


In conclusion: Understanding how varying environmental factors affect foundational elements like slabs requires careful analysis alongside practical interventions designed specifically toward addressing unique challenges posed both directly (through immediate physical repairs) & indirectly (via preventative strategies aimed at reducing potential risks). By taking proactive steps now toward safeguarding property against inevitable shifts occurring naturally within our ever-changing world outside any given structure's confines-we ensure continued stability well into future generations who'll inherit these places we call home today!

Case Studies and Real-Life Examples: Examination of past incidents where shifting soils led to significant foundation issues and subsequent repairs.

Title: Evaluating Temperature Fluctuations and Their Impact on Slab Integrity: Preventative Measures to Mitigate Future Damage from Environmental Stressors


In the realm of civil engineering and construction, the integrity of concrete slabs is a cornerstone for ensuring the safety and longevity of structures. One of the most significant challenges faced by engineers is the impact of temperature fluctuations on these slabs. As temperatures rise and fall, they induce thermal expansion and contraction in concrete materials, potentially leading to cracking, warping, or even catastrophic structural failures. To address these concerns, it is imperative to explore preventative measures that can mitigate future damage caused by such environmental stressors.


Temperature fluctuations exert their influence primarily through two mechanisms: thermal expansion and freeze-thaw cycles. When temperatures increase, concrete expands; conversely, when they decrease, it contracts. This constant push-and-pull effect can cause micro-cracks which may propagate over time if not properly managed. Additionally, in colder climates where freeze-thaw cycles are prevalent, water ingress into cracks can freeze and expand, exacerbating existing damage and reducing slab integrity.


To combat these issues effectively, several preventative strategies have been identified. First among them is the use of proper mix design in concrete production. By incorporating admixtures like fly ash or slag cement into the mix, engineers can enhance the material's resistance to thermal changes while also improving its overall durability. These supplementary cementitious materials help reduce permeability and improve moisture retention properties within the slab.


Another key measure involves reinforcement techniques that enhance slab flexibility and resilience against temperature-induced stress. The use of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) or steel fibers within the concrete matrix can significantly improve its tensile strength and energy absorption capacity. This reinforcement helps distribute stress more evenly across the slab surface during temperature fluctuations.


Moreover, effective joint design plays a crucial role in accommodating movements due to thermal expansion or contraction without compromising structural integrity. Properly placed control joints facilitate controlled cracking at predetermined locations rather than allowing random crack formation throughout the slab surface.




Evaluating Temperature Fluctuations and Their Impact on Slab Integrity - company

  1. crawl space
  2. erosion
  3. customer

Additionally, implementing appropriate insulation measures during construction can serve as a buffer against extreme temperature variations. Insulating materials placed beneath or around slabs help maintain more stable internal temperatures by reducing direct exposure to external environmental changes.


Finally yet importantly is regular maintenance practices aimed at identifying potential problem areas before they escalate into major issues over time; inspection routines should be scheduled periodically so minor damages such as superficial cracks are repaired promptly using sealants specifically designed for this purpose before further deterioration occurs due exposure weather elements including water intrusion ice formation among others factors involved here too!


In conclusion then we see how crucial monitoring controlling mitigating effects due fluctuation impacts upon our vital infrastructure projects becomes paramount importance today tomorrow alike! Advances technology along with tried tested methods provide us arsenal tools necessary ensure continued success longevity all types structures worldwide regardless region climate conditions encountered therein!

 

An actively eroding rill on an intensively-farmed field in eastern Germany. This phenomenon is aggravated by poor agricultural practices because when ploughing, the furrows were traced in the direction of the slope rather than that of the terrain contour lines.

Erosion is the action of surface processes (such as water flow or wind) that removes soil, rock, or dissolved material from one location on the Earth's crust and then transports it to another location where it is deposited. Erosion is distinct from weathering which involves no movement.[1][2] Removal of rock or soil as clastic sediment is referred to as physical or mechanical erosion; this contrasts with chemical erosion, where soil or rock material is removed from an area by dissolution.[3] Eroded sediment or solutes may be transported just a few millimetres, or for thousands of kilometres.

Agents of erosion include rainfall;[4] bedrock wear in rivers; coastal erosion by the sea and waves; glacial plucking, abrasion, and scour; areal flooding; wind abrasion; groundwater processes; and mass movement processes in steep landscapes like landslides and debris flows. The rates at which such processes act control how fast a surface is eroded. Typically, physical erosion proceeds the fastest on steeply sloping surfaces, and rates may also be sensitive to some climatically controlled properties including amounts of water supplied (e.g., by rain), storminess, wind speed, wave fetch, or atmospheric temperature (especially for some ice-related processes). Feedbacks are also possible between rates of erosion and the amount of eroded material that is already carried by, for example, a river or glacier.[5][6] The transport of eroded materials from their original location is followed by deposition, which is arrival and emplacement of material at a new location.[1]

While erosion is a natural process, human activities have increased by 10–40 times the rate at which soil erosion is occurring globally.[7] At agriculture sites in the Appalachian Mountains, intensive farming practices have caused erosion at up to 100 times the natural rate of erosion in the region.[8] Excessive (or accelerated) erosion causes both "on-site" and "off-site" problems. On-site impacts include decreases in agricultural productivity and (on natural landscapes) ecological collapse, both because of loss of the nutrient-rich upper soil layers. In some cases, this leads to desertification. Off-site effects include sedimentation of waterways and eutrophication of water bodies, as well as sediment-related damage to roads and houses. Water and wind erosion are the two primary causes of land degradation; combined, they are responsible for about 84% of the global extent of degraded land, making excessive erosion one of the most significant environmental problems worldwide.[9]: 2 [10]: 1 [11]

Intensive agriculture, deforestation, roads, anthropogenic climate change and urban sprawl are amongst the most significant human activities in regard to their effect on stimulating erosion.[12] However, there are many prevention and remediation practices that can curtail or limit erosion of vulnerable soils.

A natural arch produced by the wind erosion of differentially weathered rock in Jebel Kharaz, Jordan
A wave-like sea cliff produced by coastal erosion, in Jinshitan Coastal National Geopark, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China

Physical processes

[edit]

Rainfall and surface runoff

[edit]
Soil and water being splashed by the impact of a single raindrop

Rainfall, and the surface runoff which may result from rainfall, produces four main types of soil erosion: splash erosion, sheet erosion, rill erosion, and gully erosion. Splash erosion is generally seen as the first and least severe stage in the soil erosion process, which is followed by sheet erosion, then rill erosion and finally gully erosion (the most severe of the four).[10]: 60–61 [13]

In splash erosion, the impact of a falling raindrop creates a small crater in the soil,[14] ejecting soil particles.[4] The distance these soil particles travel can be as much as 0.6 m (2.0 ft) vertically and 1.5 m (4.9 ft) horizontally on level ground.

If the soil is saturated, or if the rainfall rate is greater than the rate at which water can infiltrate into the soil, surface runoff occurs. If the runoff has sufficient flow energy, it will transport loosened soil particles (sediment) down the slope.[15] Sheet erosion is the transport of loosened soil particles by overland flow.[15]

A spoil tip covered in rills and gullies due to erosion processes caused by rainfall: Rummu, Estonia

Rill erosion refers to the development of small, ephemeral concentrated flow paths which function as both sediment source and sediment delivery systems for erosion on hillslopes. Generally, where water erosion rates on disturbed upland areas are greatest, rills are active. Flow depths in rills are typically of the order of a few centimetres (about an inch) or less and along-channel slopes may be quite steep. This means that rills exhibit hydraulic physics very different from water flowing through the deeper, wider channels of streams and rivers.[16]

Gully erosion occurs when runoff water accumulates and rapidly flows in narrow channels during or immediately after heavy rains or melting snow, removing soil to a considerable depth.[17][18][19] A gully is distinguished from a rill based on a critical cross-sectional area of at least one square foot, i.e. the size of a channel that can no longer be erased via normal tillage operations.[20]

Extreme gully erosion can progress to formation of badlands. These form under conditions of high relief on easily eroded bedrock in climates favorable to erosion. Conditions or disturbances that limit the growth of protective vegetation (rhexistasy) are a key element of badland formation.[21]

Rivers and streams

[edit]
Dobbingstone Burn, Scotland, showing two different types of erosion affecting the same place. Valley erosion is occurring due to the flow of the stream, and the boulders and stones (and much of the soil) that are lying on the stream's banks are glacial till that was left behind as ice age glaciers flowed over the terrain.
Layers of chalk exposed by a river eroding through them
Green land erosion
Green land erosion

Valley or stream erosion occurs with continued water flow along a linear feature. The erosion is both downward, deepening the valley, and headward, extending the valley into the hillside, creating head cuts and steep banks. In the earliest stage of stream erosion, the erosive activity is dominantly vertical, the valleys have a typical V-shaped cross-section and the stream gradient is relatively steep. When some base level is reached, the erosive activity switches to lateral erosion, which widens the valley floor and creates a narrow floodplain. The stream gradient becomes nearly flat, and lateral deposition of sediments becomes important as the stream meanders across the valley floor. In all stages of stream erosion, by far the most erosion occurs during times of flood when more and faster-moving water is available to carry a larger sediment load. In such processes, it is not the water alone that erodes: suspended abrasive particles, pebbles, and boulders can also act erosively as they traverse a surface, in a process known as traction.[22]

Bank erosion is the wearing away of the banks of a stream or river. This is distinguished from changes on the bed of the watercourse, which is referred to as scour. Erosion and changes in the form of river banks may be measured by inserting metal rods into the bank and marking the position of the bank surface along the rods at different times.[23]

Thermal erosion is the result of melting and weakening permafrost due to moving water.[24] It can occur both along rivers and at the coast. Rapid river channel migration observed in the Lena River of Siberia is due to thermal erosion, as these portions of the banks are composed of permafrost-cemented non-cohesive materials.[25] Much of this erosion occurs as the weakened banks fail in large slumps. Thermal erosion also affects the Arctic coast, where wave action and near-shore temperatures combine to undercut permafrost bluffs along the shoreline and cause them to fail. Annual erosion rates along a 100-kilometre (62-mile) segment of the Beaufort Sea shoreline averaged 5.6 metres (18 feet) per year from 1955 to 2002.[26]

Most river erosion happens nearer to the mouth of a river. On a river bend, the longest least sharp side has slower moving water. Here deposits build up. On the narrowest sharpest side of the bend, there is faster moving water so this side tends to erode away mostly.

Rapid erosion by a large river can remove enough sediments to produce a river anticline,[27] as isostatic rebound raises rock beds unburdened by erosion of overlying beds.

Coastal erosion

[edit]
Wave cut platform caused by erosion of cliffs by the sea, at Southerndown in South Wales
Erosion of the boulder clay (of Pleistocene age) along cliffs of Filey Bay, Yorkshire, England

Shoreline erosion, which occurs on both exposed and sheltered coasts, primarily occurs through the action of currents and waves but sea level (tidal) change can also play a role.

Sea-dune erosion at Talacre beach, Wales

Hydraulic action takes place when the air in a joint is suddenly compressed by a wave closing the entrance of the joint. This then cracks it. Wave pounding is when the sheer energy of the wave hitting the cliff or rock breaks pieces off. Abrasion or corrasion is caused by waves launching sea load at the cliff. It is the most effective and rapid form of shoreline erosion (not to be confused with corrosion). Corrosion is the dissolving of rock by carbonic acid in sea water.[28] Limestone cliffs are particularly vulnerable to this kind of erosion. Attrition is where particles/sea load carried by the waves are worn down as they hit each other and the cliffs. This then makes the material easier to wash away. The material ends up as shingle and sand. Another significant source of erosion, particularly on carbonate coastlines, is boring, scraping and grinding of organisms, a process termed bioerosion.[29]

Sediment is transported along the coast in the direction of the prevailing current (longshore drift). When the upcurrent supply of sediment is less than the amount being carried away, erosion occurs. When the upcurrent amount of sediment is greater, sand or gravel banks will tend to form as a result of deposition. These banks may slowly migrate along the coast in the direction of the longshore drift, alternately protecting and exposing parts of the coastline. Where there is a bend in the coastline, quite often a buildup of eroded material occurs forming a long narrow bank (a spit). Armoured beaches and submerged offshore sandbanks may also protect parts of a coastline from erosion. Over the years, as the shoals gradually shift, the erosion may be redirected to attack different parts of the shore.[30]

Erosion of a coastal surface, followed by a fall in sea level, can produce a distinctive landform called a raised beach.[31]

Chemical erosion

[edit]

Chemical erosion is the loss of matter in a landscape in the form of solutes. Chemical erosion is usually calculated from the solutes found in streams. Anders Rapp pioneered the study of chemical erosion in his work about Kärkevagge published in 1960.[32]

Formation of sinkholes and other features of karst topography is an example of extreme chemical erosion.[33]

Glaciers

[edit]
The Devil's Nest (Pirunpesä), the deepest ground erosion in Europe,[34] located in Jalasjärvi, Kurikka, Finland
Glacial moraines above Lake Louise, in Alberta, Canada

Glaciers erode predominantly by three different processes: abrasion/scouring, plucking, and ice thrusting. In an abrasion process, debris in the basal ice scrapes along the bed, polishing and gouging the underlying rocks, similar to sandpaper on wood. Scientists have shown that, in addition to the role of temperature played in valley-deepening, other glaciological processes, such as erosion also control cross-valley variations. In a homogeneous bedrock erosion pattern, curved channel cross-section beneath the ice is created. Though the glacier continues to incise vertically, the shape of the channel beneath the ice eventually remain constant, reaching a U-shaped parabolic steady-state shape as we now see in glaciated valleys. Scientists also provide a numerical estimate of the time required for the ultimate formation of a steady-shaped U-shaped valley—approximately 100,000 years. In a weak bedrock (containing material more erodible than the surrounding rocks) erosion pattern, on the contrary, the amount of over deepening is limited because ice velocities and erosion rates are reduced.[35]

Glaciers can also cause pieces of bedrock to crack off in the process of plucking. In ice thrusting, the glacier freezes to its bed, then as it surges forward, it moves large sheets of frozen sediment at the base along with the glacier. This method produced some of the many thousands of lake basins that dot the edge of the Canadian Shield. Differences in the height of mountain ranges are not only being the result tectonic forces, such as rock uplift, but also local climate variations. Scientists use global analysis of topography to show that glacial erosion controls the maximum height of mountains, as the relief between mountain peaks and the snow line are generally confined to altitudes less than 1500 m.[36] The erosion caused by glaciers worldwide erodes mountains so effectively that the term glacial buzzsaw has become widely used, which describes the limiting effect of glaciers on the height of mountain ranges.[37] As mountains grow higher, they generally allow for more glacial activity (especially in the accumulation zone above the glacial equilibrium line altitude),[38] which causes increased rates of erosion of the mountain, decreasing mass faster than isostatic rebound can add to the mountain.[39] This provides a good example of a negative feedback loop. Ongoing research is showing that while glaciers tend to decrease mountain size, in some areas, glaciers can actually reduce the rate of erosion, acting as a glacial armor.[37] Ice can not only erode mountains but also protect them from erosion. Depending on glacier regime, even steep alpine lands can be preserved through time with the help of ice. Scientists have proved this theory by sampling eight summits of northwestern Svalbard using Be10 and Al26, showing that northwestern Svalbard transformed from a glacier-erosion state under relatively mild glacial maxima temperature, to a glacier-armor state occupied by cold-based, protective ice during much colder glacial maxima temperatures as the Quaternary ice age progressed.[40]

These processes, combined with erosion and transport by the water network beneath the glacier, leave behind glacial landforms such as moraines, drumlins, ground moraine (till), glaciokarst, kames, kame deltas, moulins, and glacial erratics in their wake, typically at the terminus or during glacier retreat.[41]

The best-developed glacial valley morphology appears to be restricted to landscapes with low rock uplift rates (less than or equal to 2mm per year) and high relief, leading to long-turnover times. Where rock uplift rates exceed 2mm per year, glacial valley morphology has generally been significantly modified in postglacial time. Interplay of glacial erosion and tectonic forcing governs the morphologic impact of glaciations on active orogens, by both influencing their height, and by altering the patterns of erosion during subsequent glacial periods via a link between rock uplift and valley cross-sectional shape.[42]

Floods

[edit]
The mouth of the River Seaton in Cornwall after heavy rainfall caused flooding in the area and cause a significant amount of the beach to erode
The mouth of the River Seaton in Cornwall after heavy rainfall caused flooding in the area and cause a significant amount of the beach to erode; leaving behind a tall sand bank in its place

At extremely high flows, kolks, or vortices are formed by large volumes of rapidly rushing water. Kolks cause extreme local erosion, plucking bedrock and creating pothole-type geographical features called rock-cut basins. Examples can be seen in the flood regions result from glacial Lake Missoula, which created the channeled scablands in the Columbia Basin region of eastern Washington.[43]

Wind erosion

[edit]
Árbol de Piedra, a rock formation in the Altiplano, Bolivia sculpted by wind erosion

Wind erosion is a major geomorphological force, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. It is also a major source of land degradation, evaporation, desertification, harmful airborne dust, and crop damage—especially after being increased far above natural rates by human activities such as deforestation, urbanization, and agriculture.[44][45]

Wind erosion is of two primary varieties: deflation, where the wind picks up and carries away loose particles; and abrasion, where surfaces are worn down as they are struck by airborne particles carried by wind. Deflation is divided into three categories: (1) surface creep, where larger, heavier particles slide or roll along the ground; (2) saltation, where particles are lifted a short height into the air, and bounce and saltate across the surface of the soil; and (3) suspension, where very small and light particles are lifted into the air by the wind, and are often carried for long distances. Saltation is responsible for the majority (50–70%) of wind erosion, followed by suspension (30–40%), and then surface creep (5–25%).[46]: 57 [47]

Wind erosion is much more severe in arid areas and during times of drought. For example, in the Great Plains, it is estimated that soil loss due to wind erosion can be as much as 6100 times greater in drought years than in wet years.[48]

Mass wasting

[edit]
A wadi in Makhtesh Ramon, Israel, showing gravity collapse erosion on its banks

Mass wasting or mass movement is the downward and outward movement of rock and sediments on a sloped surface, mainly due to the force of gravity.[49][50]

Mass wasting is an important part of the erosional process and is often the first stage in the breakdown and transport of weathered materials in mountainous areas.[51]: 93  It moves material from higher elevations to lower elevations where other eroding agents such as streams and glaciers can then pick up the material and move it to even lower elevations. Mass-wasting processes are always occurring continuously on all slopes; some mass-wasting processes act very slowly; others occur very suddenly, often with disastrous results. Any perceptible down-slope movement of rock or sediment is often referred to in general terms as a landslide. However, landslides can be classified in a much more detailed way that reflects the mechanisms responsible for the movement and the velocity at which the movement occurs. One of the visible topographical manifestations of a very slow form of such activity is a scree slope.[citation needed]

Slumping happens on steep hillsides, occurring along distinct fracture zones, often within materials like clay that, once released, may move quite rapidly downhill. They will often show a spoon-shaped isostatic depression, in which the material has begun to slide downhill. In some cases, the slump is caused by water beneath the slope weakening it. In many cases it is simply the result of poor engineering along highways where it is a regular occurrence.[52]

Surface creep is the slow movement of soil and rock debris by gravity which is usually not perceptible except through extended observation. However, the term can also describe the rolling of dislodged soil particles 0.5 to 1.0 mm (0.02 to 0.04 in) in diameter by wind along the soil surface.[53]

Submarine sediment gravity flows

[edit]
Bathymetry of submarine canyons in the continental slope off the coast of New York and New Jersey

On the continental slope, erosion of the ocean floor to create channels and submarine canyons can result from the rapid downslope flow of sediment gravity flows, bodies of sediment-laden water that move rapidly downslope as turbidity currents. Where erosion by turbidity currents creates oversteepened slopes it can also trigger underwater landslides and debris flows. Turbidity currents can erode channels and canyons into substrates ranging from recently deposited unconsolidated sediments to hard crystalline bedrock.[54][55][56] Almost all continental slopes and deep ocean basins display such channels and canyons resulting from sediment gravity flows and submarine canyons act as conduits for the transfer of sediment from the continents and shallow marine environments to the deep sea.[57][58][59] Turbidites, which are the sedimentary deposits resulting from turbidity currents, comprise some of the thickest and largest sedimentary sequences on Earth, indicating that the associated erosional processes must also have played a prominent role in Earth's history.

Factors affecting erosion rates

[edit]

Climate

[edit]

The amount and intensity of precipitation is the main climatic factor governing soil erosion by water. The relationship is particularly strong if heavy rainfall occurs at times when, or in locations where, the soil's surface is not well protected by vegetation. This might be during periods when agricultural activities leave the soil bare, or in semi-arid regions where vegetation is naturally sparse. Wind erosion requires strong winds, particularly during times of drought when vegetation is sparse and soil is dry (and so is more erodible). Other climatic factors such as average temperature and temperature range may also affect erosion, via their effects on vegetation and soil properties. In general, given similar vegetation and ecosystems, areas with more precipitation (especially high-intensity rainfall), more wind, or more storms are expected to have more erosion.

In some areas of the world (e.g. the mid-western US), rainfall intensity is the primary determinant of erosivity (for a definition of erosivity check,[60]) with higher intensity rainfall generally resulting in more soil erosion by water. The size and velocity of rain drops is also an important factor. Larger and higher-velocity rain drops have greater kinetic energy, and thus their impact will displace soil particles by larger distances than smaller, slower-moving rain drops.[61]

In other regions of the world (e.g. western Europe), runoff and erosion result from relatively low intensities of stratiform rainfall falling onto the previously saturated soil. In such situations, rainfall amount rather than intensity is the main factor determining the severity of soil erosion by water.[17] According to the climate change projections, erosivity will increase significantly in Europe and soil erosion may increase by 13–22.5% by 2050 [62]

In Taiwan, where typhoon frequency increased significantly in the 21st century, a strong link has been drawn between the increase in storm frequency with an increase in sediment load in rivers and reservoirs, highlighting the impacts climate change can have on erosion.[63]

Vegetative cover

[edit]

Vegetation acts as an interface between the atmosphere and the soil. It increases the permeability of the soil to rainwater, thus decreasing runoff. It shelters the soil from winds, which results in decreased wind erosion, as well as advantageous changes in microclimate. The roots of the plants bind the soil together, and interweave with other roots, forming a more solid mass that is less susceptible to both water[64] and wind erosion. The removal of vegetation increases the rate of surface erosion.[65]

Topography

[edit]

The topography of the land determines the velocity at which surface runoff will flow, which in turn determines the erosivity of the runoff. Longer, steeper slopes (especially those without adequate vegetative cover) are more susceptible to very high rates of erosion during heavy rains than shorter, less steep slopes. Steeper terrain is also more prone to mudslides, landslides, and other forms of gravitational erosion processes.[61]: 28–30 [66][67]

Tectonics

[edit]

Tectonic processes control rates and distributions of erosion at the Earth's surface. If the tectonic action causes part of the Earth's surface (e.g., a mountain range) to be raised or lowered relative to surrounding areas, this must necessarily change the gradient of the land surface. Because erosion rates are almost always sensitive to the local slope (see above), this will change the rates of erosion in the uplifted area. Active tectonics also brings fresh, unweathered rock towards the surface, where it is exposed to the action of erosion.

However, erosion can also affect tectonic processes. The removal by erosion of large amounts of rock from a particular region, and its deposition elsewhere, can result in a lightening of the load on the lower crust and mantle. Because tectonic processes are driven by gradients in the stress field developed in the crust, this unloading can in turn cause tectonic or isostatic uplift in the region.[51]: 99 [68] In some cases, it has been hypothesised that these twin feedbacks can act to localize and enhance zones of very rapid exhumation of deep crustal rocks beneath places on the Earth's surface with extremely high erosion rates, for example, beneath the extremely steep terrain of Nanga Parbat in the western Himalayas. Such a place has been called a "tectonic aneurysm".[69]

Development

[edit]

Human land development, in forms including agricultural and urban development, is considered a significant factor in erosion and sediment transport, which aggravate food insecurity.[70] In Taiwan, increases in sediment load in the northern, central, and southern regions of the island can be tracked with the timeline of development for each region throughout the 20th century.[63] The intentional removal of soil and rock by humans is a form of erosion that has been named lisasion.[71]

Erosion at various scales

[edit]

Mountain ranges

[edit]

Mountain ranges take millions of years to erode to the degree they effectively cease to exist. Scholars Pitman and Golovchenko estimate that it takes probably more than 450 million years to erode a mountain mass similar to the Himalaya into an almost-flat peneplain if there are no significant sea-level changes.[72] Erosion of mountains massifs can create a pattern of equally high summits called summit accordance.[73] It has been argued that extension during post-orogenic collapse is a more effective mechanism of lowering the height of orogenic mountains than erosion.[74]

Examples of heavily eroded mountain ranges include the Timanides of Northern Russia. Erosion of this orogen has produced sediments that are now found in the East European Platform, including the Cambrian Sablya Formation near Lake Ladoga. Studies of these sediments indicate that it is likely that the erosion of the orogen began in the Cambrian and then intensified in the Ordovician.[75]

Soils

[edit]

If the erosion rate exceeds soil formation, erosion destroys the soil.[76] Lower rates of erosion can prevent the formation of soil features that take time to develop. Inceptisols develop on eroded landscapes that, if stable, would have supported the formation of more developed Alfisols.[77]

While erosion of soils is a natural process, human activities have increased by 10-40 times the rate at which erosion occurs globally. Excessive (or accelerated) erosion causes both "on-site" and "off-site" problems. On-site impacts include decreases in agricultural productivity and (on natural landscapes) ecological collapse, both because of loss of the nutrient-rich upper soil layers. In some cases, the eventual result is desertification. Off-site effects include sedimentation of waterways and eutrophication of water bodies, as well as sediment-related damage to roads and houses. Water and wind erosion are the two primary causes of land degradation; combined, they are responsible for about 84% of the global extent of degraded land, making excessive erosion one of the most significant environmental problems.[10][78]

Often in the United States, farmers cultivating highly erodible land must comply with a conservation plan to be eligible for agricultural assistance.[79]

Consequences of human-made soil erosion

[edit]

See also

[edit]
  • Bridge scour – Erosion of sediment near bridge foundations by water
  • Cellular confinement – Confinement system used in construction and geotechnical engineering
  • Colluvium – Loose, unconsolidated sediments deposited at the base of a hillslope
  • Groundwater sapping
  • Lessivage
  • Space weathering – Type of weathering
  • Vetiver System – System of soil and water conservation

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "Erosion". Encyclopædia Britannica. 2015-12-03. Archived from the original on 2015-12-21. Retrieved 2015-12-06.
  2. ^ Allaby, Michael (2013). "Erosion". A dictionary of geology and earth sciences (Fourth ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199653065.
  3. ^ Louvat, P.; Gislason, S. R.; Allegre, C. J. (1 May 2008). "Chemical and mechanical erosion rates in Iceland as deduced from river dissolved and solid material". American Journal of Science. 308 (5): 679–726. Bibcode:2008AmJS..308..679L. doi:10.2475/05.2008.02. S2CID 130966449.
  4. ^ a b Cheraghi, M.; Jomaa, S.; Sander, G.C.; Barry, D.A. (2016). "Hysteretic sediment fluxes in rainfall-driven soil erosion: Particle size effects" (PDF). Water Resour. Res. 52 (11): 8613. Bibcode:2016WRR....52.8613C. doi:10.1002/2016WR019314. S2CID 13077807.[permanent dead link]
  5. ^ Hallet, Bernard (1981). "Glacial Abrasion and Sliding: Their Dependence on the Debris Concentration In Basal Ice". Annals of Glaciology. 2 (1): 23–28. Bibcode:1981AnGla...2...23H. doi:10.3189/172756481794352487. ISSN 0260-3055.
  6. ^ Sklar, Leonard S.; Dietrich, William E. (2004). "A mechanistic model for river incision into bedrock by saltating bed load" (PDF). Water Resources Research. 40 (6): W06301. Bibcode:2004WRR....40.6301S. doi:10.1029/2003WR002496. ISSN 0043-1397. S2CID 130040766. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-10-11. Retrieved 2016-06-18.
  7. ^ Dotterweich, Markus (2013-11-01). "The history of human-induced soil erosion: Geomorphic legacies, early descriptions and research, and the development of soil conservation – A global synopsis". Geomorphology. 201: 1–34. Bibcode:2013Geomo.201....1D. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.07.021. S2CID 129797403.
  8. ^ Reusser, L.; Bierman, P.; Rood, D. (2015). "Quantifying human impacts on rates of erosion and sediment transport at a landscape scale". Geology. 43 (2): 171–174. Bibcode:2015Geo....43..171R. doi:10.1130/g36272.1.
  9. ^ Blanco-Canqui, Humberto; Rattan, Lal (2008). "Soil and water conservation". Principles of soil conservation and management. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 1–20. ISBN 978-1-4020-8709-7.
  10. ^ a b c Toy, Terrence J.; Foster, George R.; Renard, Kenneth G. (2002). Soil erosion : processes, prediction, measurement, and control. New York: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-38369-7.
  11. ^ Apollo, M.; Andreychouk, V.; Bhattarai, S.S. (2018-03-24). "Short-Term Impacts of Livestock Grazing on Vegetation and Track Formation in a High Mountain Environment: A Case Study from the Himalayan Miyar Valley (India)". Sustainability. 10 (4): 951. doi:10.3390/su10040951. ISSN 2071-1050.
  12. ^ Julien, Pierre Y. (2010). Erosion and Sedimentation. Cambridge University Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-521-53737-7.
  13. ^ Zachar, Dušan (1982). "Classification of soil erosion". Soil Erosion. Vol. 10. Elsevier. p. 48. ISBN 978-0-444-99725-8.
  14. ^ See Figure 1 in Obreschkow, D.; Dorsaz, N.; Kobel, P.; De Bosset, A.; Tinguely, M.; Field, J.; Farhat, M. (2011). "Confined Shocks inside Isolated Liquid Volumes – A New Path of Erosion?". Physics of Fluids. 23 (10): 101702. arXiv:1109.3175. Bibcode:2011PhFl...23j1702O. doi:10.1063/1.3647583. S2CID 59437729.
  15. ^ a b Food and Agriculture Organization (1965). "Types of erosion damage". Soil Erosion by Water: Some Measures for Its Control on Cultivated Lands. United Nations. pp. 23–25. ISBN 978-92-5-100474-6.
  16. ^ Nearing, M.A.; Norton, L.D.; Bulgakov, D.A.; Larionov, G.A.; West, L.T.; Dontsova, K.M. (1997). "Hydraulics and erosion in eroding rills". Water Resources Research. 33 (4): 865–876. Bibcode:1997WRR....33..865N. doi:10.1029/97wr00013.
  17. ^ a b Boardman, John; Poesen, Jean, eds. (2007). Soil Erosion in Europe. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-85911-7.
  18. ^ J. Poesen; L. Vandekerckhove; J. Nachtergaele; D. Oostwoud Wijdenes; G. Verstraeten; B. Can Wesemael (2002). "Gully erosion in dryland environments". In Bull, Louise J.; Kirby, M.J. (eds.). Dryland Rivers: Hydrology and Geomorphology of Semi-Arid Channels. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 229–262. ISBN 978-0-471-49123-1.
  19. ^ Borah, Deva K.; et al. (2008). "Watershed sediment yield". In Garcia, Marcelo H. (ed.). Sedimentation Engineering: Processes, Measurements, Modeling, and Practice. ASCE Publishing. p. 828. ISBN 978-0-7844-0814-8.
  20. ^ Vanmaercke, Matthias; Panagos, Panos; Vanwalleghem, Tom; Hayas, Antonio; Foerster, Saskia; Borrelli, Pasquale; Rossi, Mauro; Torri, Dino; Casali, Javier; Borselli, Lorenzo; Vigiak, Olga (July 2021). "Measuring, modelling and managing gully erosion at large scales: A state of the art". Earth-Science Reviews. 218: 103637. Bibcode:2021ESRv..21803637V. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103637. hdl:10198/24417. S2CID 234800558.
  21. ^ Moreno-de las Heras, Mariano; Gallart, Francesc (2018). "The Origin of Badlands". Badlands Dynamics in a Context of Global Change: 27–59. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-813054-4.00002-2. ISBN 9780128130544.
  22. ^ Ritter, Michael E. (2006) "Geologic Work of Streams" Archived 2012-05-06 at the Wayback Machine The Physical Environment: an Introduction to Physical Geography University of Wisconsin, OCLC 79006225
  23. ^ Nancy D. Gordon (2004). "Erosion and Scour". Stream hydrology: an introduction for ecologists. John Wiley and Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-84357-4.
  24. ^ "Thermal Erosion". NSIDC Glossary. National Snow and Ice Data Center. Archived from the original on 2010-12-18. Retrieved 21 December 2009.
  25. ^ Costard, F.; Dupeyrat, L.; Gautier, E.; Carey-Gailhardis, E. (2003). "Fluvial thermal erosion investigations along a rapidly eroding river bank: application to the Lena River (central Siberia)". Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 28 (12): 1349–1359. Bibcode:2003ESPL...28.1349C. doi:10.1002/esp.592. S2CID 131318239.
  26. ^ Jones, B.M.; Hinkel, K.M.; Arp, C.D.; Eisner, W.R. (2008). "Modern Erosion Rates and Loss of Coastal Features and Sites, Beaufort Sea Coastline, Alaska". Arctic. 61 (4): 361–372. doi:10.14430/arctic44. hdl:10535/5534. Archived from the original on 2013-05-17.
  27. ^ Montgomery, David R.; Stolar, Drew B. (1 December 2006). "Reconsidering Himalayan river anticlines". Geomorphology. 82 (1–2): 4–15. Bibcode:2006Geomo..82....4M. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.08.021.
  28. ^ Geddes, Ian. "Lithosphere". Higher geography for cfe: physical and human environments, Hodder Education, 2015.
  29. ^ Glynn, Peter W. "Bioerosion and coral-reef growth: a dynamic balance". Life and death of coral reefs (1997): 68–95.
  30. ^ Bell, Frederic Gladstone. "Marine action and control". Geological hazards: their assessment, avoidance, and mitigation, Taylor & Francis, 1999, pp. 302–306.
  31. ^ Pinter, N (2010). "Exercise 6 - Coastal Terraces, Sealevel, and Active Tectonics" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-10-10. Retrieved 2011-04-21.
  32. ^ Dixon, John C.; Thorn, Colin E. (2005). "Chemical weathering and landscape development in mid-latitude alpine environments". Geomorphology. 67 (1–2): 127–145. Bibcode:2005Geomo..67..127D. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.07.009.
  33. ^ Lard, L.; Paull, C.; Hobson, B. (1995). "Genesis of a submarine sinkhole without subaerial exposure". Geology. 23 (10): 949–951. Bibcode:1995Geo....23..949L. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<0949:GOASSW>2.3.CO;2.
  34. ^ "The Devil's Nest, the deepest ground erosion in Europe".
  35. ^ Harbor, Jonathan M.; Hallet, Bernard; Raymond, Charles F. (1988-05-26). "A numerical model of landform development by glacial erosion". Nature. 333 (6171): 347–349. Bibcode:1988Natur.333..347H. doi:10.1038/333347a0. S2CID 4273817.
  36. ^ Egholm, D. L.; Nielsen, S. B.; Pedersen, V.K.; Lesemann, J.-E. (2009). "Glacial effects limiting mountain height". Nature. 460 (7257): 884–887. Bibcode:2009Natur.460..884E. doi:10.1038/nature08263. PMID 19675651. S2CID 205217746.
  37. ^ a b Thomson, Stuart N.; Brandon, Mark T.; Tomkin, Jonathan H.; Reiners, Peter W.; Vásquez, Cristián; Wilson, Nathaniel J. (2010). "Glaciation as a destructive and constructive control on mountain building". Nature. 467 (7313): 313–317. Bibcode:2010Natur.467..313T. doi:10.1038/nature09365. hdl:10533/144849. PMID 20844534. S2CID 205222252.
  38. ^ Tomkin, J.H.; Roe, G.H. (2007). "Climate and tectonic controls on glaciated critical-taper orogens" (PDF). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 262 (3–4): 385–397. Bibcode:2007E&PSL.262..385T. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.477.3927. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2007.07.040. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-08-09. Retrieved 2017-10-24.
  39. ^ Mitchell, S.G. & Montgomery, D.R. "Influence of a glacial buzzsaw on the height and morphology of the Cascade Range in central Washington State". Quat. Res. 65, 96–107 (2006)
  40. ^ Gjermundsen, Endre F.; Briner, Jason P.; Akçar, Naki; Foros, Jørn; Kubik, Peter W.; Salvigsen, Otto; Hormes, Anne (2015). "Minimal erosion of Arctic alpine topography during late Quaternary glaciation". Nature Geoscience. 8 (10): 789. Bibcode:2015NatGe...8..789G. doi:10.1038/ngeo2524.
  41. ^ Harvey, A.M. "Local-Scale geomorphology – process systems and landforms". Introducing Geomorphology: A Guide to Landforms and Processes. Dunedin Academic Press, 2012, pp. 87–88. EBSCOhost.
  42. ^ Prasicek, Günther; Larsen, Isaac J.; Montgomery, David R. (2015-08-14). "Tectonic control on the persistence of glacially sculpted topography". Nature Communications. 6: 8028. Bibcode:2015NatCo...6.8028P. doi:10.1038/ncomms9028. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 4557346. PMID 26271245.
  43. ^ See, for example: Alt, David (2001). Glacial Lake Missoula & its Humongous Floods. Mountain Press. ISBN 978-0-87842-415-3.
  44. ^ Zheng, Xiaojing; Huang, Ning (2009). Mechanics of Wind-Blown Sand Movements. Springer. pp. 7–8. Bibcode:2009mwbs.book.....Z. ISBN 978-3-540-88253-4.
  45. ^ Cornelis, Wim S. (2006). "Hydroclimatology of wind erosion in arid and semi-arid environments". In D'Odorico, Paolo; Porporato, Amilcare (eds.). Dryland Ecohydrology. Springer. p. 141. ISBN 978-1-4020-4261-4.
  46. ^ Blanco-Canqui, Humberto; Rattan, Lal (2008). "Wind erosion". Principles of soil conservation and management. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 54–80. ISBN 978-1-4020-8709-7.
  47. ^ Balba, A. Monem (1995). "Desertification: Wind erosion". Management of Problem Soils in Arid Ecosystems. CRC Press. p. 214. ISBN 978-0-87371-811-0.
  48. ^ Wiggs, Giles F.S. (2011). "Geomorphological hazards in drylands". In Thomas, David S.G. (ed.). Arid Zone Geomorphology: Process, Form and Change in Drylands. John Wiley & Sons. p. 588. ISBN 978-0-470-71076-0.
  49. ^ Van Beek, Rens (2008). "Hillside processes: mass wasting, slope stability, and erosion". In Norris, Joanne E.; et al. (eds.). Slope Stability and Erosion Control: Ecotechnological Solutions. Springer. Bibcode:2008ssec.conf.....N. ISBN 978-1-4020-6675-7.
  50. ^ Gray, Donald H.; Sotir, Robbin B. (1996). "Surficial erosion and mass movement". Biotechnical and Soil Bioengineering Slope Stabilization: A Practical Guide for Erosion Control. John Wiley & Sons. p. 20. ISBN 978-0-471-04978-4.
  51. ^ a b Nichols, Gary (2009). Sedimentology and Stratigraphy. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-4051-9379-5.
  52. ^ Sivashanmugam, P. (2007). Basics of Environmental Science and Engineering. New India Publishing. pp. 43–. ISBN 978-81-89422-28-8.
  53. ^ "Britannica Library". library.eb.com. Retrieved 2017-01-31.
  54. ^ Halsey, Thomas C. (15 October 2018). "Erosion of unconsolidated beds by turbidity currents". Physical Review Fluids. 3 (10): 104303. Bibcode:2018PhRvF...3j4303H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.104303. S2CID 134740576.
  55. ^ Mitchell, Neil C. (October 2014). "Bedrock erosion by sedimentary flows in submarine canyons". Geosphere. 10 (5): 892–904. Bibcode:2014Geosp..10..892M. doi:10.1130/GES01008.1.
  56. ^ Smith, M. Elliot; Werner, Samuel H.; Buscombe, Daniel; Finnegan, Noah J.; Sumner, Esther J.; Mueller, Erich R. (28 November 2018). "Seeking the Shore: Evidence for Active Submarine Canyon Head Incision Due to Coarse Sediment Supply and Focusing of Wave Energy". Geophysical Research Letters. 45 (22): 12, 403–12, 413. Bibcode:2018GeoRL..4512403S. doi:10.1029/2018GL080396. S2CID 134823668.
  57. ^ Harris, Peter T. (2020). "Seafloor geomorphology—coast, shelf, and abyss". Seafloor Geomorphology as Benthic Habitat: 115–160. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-814960-7.00006-3. ISBN 9780128149607.
  58. ^ Bührig, Laura H.; Colombera, Luca; Patacci, Marco; Mountney, Nigel P.; McCaffrey, William D. (October 2022). "A global analysis of controls on submarine-canyon geomorphology". Earth-Science Reviews. 233: 104150. Bibcode:2022ESRv..23304150B. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104150. S2CID 251576822.
  59. ^ Seafloor Geomorphology as Benthic Habitat. 2012. doi:10.1016/C2010-0-67010-6. ISBN 9780123851406. S2CID 213281574.
  60. ^ Zorn, Matija; Komac, Blaž (2013). "Erosivity". In Bobrowsky, Peter T. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer Netherlands. pp. 289–290. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4_121. ISBN 978-90-481-8699-0.
  61. ^ a b Blanco-Canqui, Humberto; Rattan, Lal (2008). "Water erosion". Principles of soil conservation and management. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 21–53 [29–31]. ISBN 978-1-4020-8709-7.
  62. ^ Panagos, Panos; Ballabio, Cristiano; Himics, Mihaly; Scarpa, Simone; Matthews, Francis; Bogonos, Mariia; Poesen, Jean; Borrelli, Pasquale (2021-10-01). "Projections of soil loss by water erosion in Europe by 2050". Environmental Science & Policy. 124: 380–392. Bibcode:2021ESPol.124..380P. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.012. ISSN 1462-9011.
  63. ^ a b Montgomery, David R.; Huang, Michelle Y.-F.; Huang, Alice Y.-L. (2014-01-01). "Regional soil erosion in response to land use and increased typhoon frequency and intensity, Taiwan". Quaternary Research. 81 (1): 15–20. Bibcode:2014QuRes..81...15M. doi:10.1016/j.yqres.2013.10.005. ISSN 0033-5894. S2CID 53649150. Archived from the original on 2017-02-24. Retrieved 2017-02-23.
  64. ^ Gyssels, G.; Poesen, J.; Bochet, E.; Li, Y. (2005-06-01). "Impact of plant roots on the resistance of soils to erosion by water: a review". Progress in Physical Geography. 29 (2): 189–217. Bibcode:2005PrPG...29..189G. doi:10.1191/0309133305pp443ra. ISSN 0309-1333. S2CID 55243167.
  65. ^ Styczen, M.E.; Morgan, R.P.C. (1995). "Engineering properties of vegetation". In Morgan, R.P.C.; Rickson, R. Jane (eds.). Slope Stabilization and Erosion Control: A Bioengineering Approach. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-419-15630-7.
  66. ^ Whisenant, Steve G. (2008). "Terrestrial systems". In Perrow Michael R.; Davy, Anthony J. (eds.). Handbook of Ecological Restoration: Principles of Restoration. Cambridge University Press. p. 89. ISBN 978-0-521-04983-2.
  67. ^ Wainwright, John; Brazier, Richard E. (2011). "Slope systems". In Thomas, David S.G. (ed.). Arid Zone Geomorphology: Process, Form and Change in Drylands. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-71076-0.
  68. ^ Burbank, Douglas W.; Anderson, Robert S. (2011). "Tectonic and surface uplift rates". Tectonic Geomorphology. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 270–271. ISBN 978-1-4443-4504-9.
  69. ^ Zeitler, P.K. et al. (2001), Erosion, Himalayan Geodynamics, and the Geomorphology of Metamorphism, GSA Today, 11, 4–9.
  70. ^ Chen, Jie (2007-01-16). "Rapid urbanization in China: A real challenge to soil protection and food security". CATENA. Influences of rapid urbanization and industrialization on soil resource and its quality in China. 69 (1): 1–15. Bibcode:2007Caten..69....1C. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006.04.019.
  71. ^ Selby, Michael John (1985). Earth's changing surface: an introduction to geomorphology. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 0-19-823252-7.
  72. ^ Pitman, W. C.; Golovchenko, X. (1991). "The effect of sea level changes on the morphology of mountain belts". Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 96 (B4): 6879–6891. Bibcode:1991JGR....96.6879P. doi:10.1029/91JB00250. ISSN 0148-0227.
  73. ^ Beckinsale, Robert P.; Chorley, Richard J. (2003) [1991]. "Chapter Seven: American Polycyclic Geomorphology". The History of the Study of Landforms. Vol. Three. Taylor & Francis e-Library. pp. 235–236.
  74. ^ Dewey, J.F.; Ryan, P.D.; Andersen, T.B. (1993). "Orogenic uplift and collapse, crustal thickness, fabrics and metamorphic phase changes: the role of eclogites". Geological Society, London, Special Publications. 76 (1): 325–343. Bibcode:1993GSLSP..76..325D. doi:10.1144/gsl.sp.1993.076.01.16. S2CID 55985869.
  75. ^ Orlov, S.Yu.; Kuznetsov, N.B.; Miller, E.D.; Soboleva, A.A.; Udoratina, O.V. (2011). "Age Constraints for the Pre-Uralide–Timanide Orogenic Event Inferred from the Study of Detrital Zircons". Doklady Earth Sciences. 440 (1): 1216–1221. Bibcode:2011DokES.440.1216O. doi:10.1134/s1028334x11090078. S2CID 128973374. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  76. ^ Lupia-Palmieri, Elvidio (2004). "Erosion". In Goudie, A.S. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Geomorphology. p. 336.
  77. ^ Alexander, Earl B. (2014). Soils in natural landscapes. CRC Press. p. 108. ISBN 978-1-4665-9436-4.
  78. ^ Blanco, Humberto; Lal, Rattan (2010). "Soil and water conservation". Principles of Soil Conservation and Management. Springer. p. 2. ISBN 978-90-481-8529-0.
  79. ^ "Farm and Commodity Policy: Glossary". United States Department of Agriculture. Archived from the original on 2 September 2011. Retrieved 17 July 2011.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Boardman, John; Poesen, Jean, eds. (2007). Soil Erosion in Europe. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-85911-7.
  • Montgomery, David (2008). Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations (1st ed.). University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-25806-8.
  • Montgomery, D.R. (8 August 2007). "Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104 (33): 13268–13272. Bibcode:2007PNAS..10413268M. doi:10.1073/pnas.0611508104. PMC 1948917. PMID 17686990.
  • Vanoni, Vito A., ed. (1975). "The nature of sedimentation problems". Sedimentation Engineering. ASCE Publications. ISBN 978-0-7844-0823-0.
  • Mainguet, Monique; Dumay, Frédéric (April 2011). Fighting wind erosion. One aspect of the combat against desertification. Les dossiers thématiques du CSFD. CSFD/Agropolis International. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 7 October 2015.
[edit]
  • The Soil Erosion Site
  • International Erosion Control Association
  • Soil Erosion Data in the European Soil Portal
  • USDA National Soil Erosion Laboratory
  • The Soil and Water Conservation Society

 

Interior of part of a damaged home in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina
Family photographs damaged by flooding
A smaller and more minor water spot caused by rainwater leaking through a roof

Water damage describes various possible losses caused by water intruding where it will enable attack of a material or system by destructive processes such as rotting of wood, mold growth, bacteria growth, rusting of steel, swelling of composite woods, de-laminating of materials such as plywood, short-circuiting of electrical devices, etc.

The damage may be imperceptibly slow and minor such as water spots that could eventually mar a surface, or it may be instantaneous and catastrophic such as burst pipes and flooding. However fast it occurs, water damage is a major contributor to loss of property.

An insurance policy may or may not cover the costs associated with water damage and the process of water damage restoration. While a common cause of residential water damage is often the failure of a sump pump, many homeowner's insurance policies do not cover the associated costs without an addendum which adds to the monthly premium of the policy. Often the verbiage of this addendum is similar to "Sewer and Drain Coverage".

In the United States, those individuals who are affected by wide-scale flooding may have the ability to apply for government and FEMA grants through the Individual Assistance program.[1] On a larger level, businesses, cities, and communities can apply to the FEMA Public Assistance program for funds to assist after a large flood. For example, the city of Fond du Lac Wisconsin received $1.2 million FEMA grant after flooding in June 2008. The program allows the city to purchase the water damaged properties, demolish the structures, and turn the former land into public green space.[citation needed]

Causes

[edit]

Water damage can originate by different sources such as a broken dishwasher hose, a washing machine overflow, a dishwasher leakage, broken/leaking pipes, flood waters, groundwater seepage, building envelope failures (leaking roof, windows, doors, siding, etc.) and clogged toilets. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, 13.7% of all water used in the home today can be attributed to plumbing leaks.[2] On average that is approximately 10,000 gallons of water per year wasted by leaks for each US home. A tiny, 1/8-inch crack in a pipe can release up to 250 gallons of water a day.[3] According to Claims Magazine in August 2000, broken water pipes ranked second to hurricanes in terms of both the number of homes damaged and the amount of claims (on average $50,000 per insurance claim[citation needed]) costs in the US.[4] Experts suggest that homeowners inspect and replace worn pipe fittings and hose connections to all household appliances that use water at least once a year. This includes washing machines, dishwashers, kitchen sinks, and bathroom lavatories, refrigerator icemakers, water softeners, and humidifiers. A few US companies offer whole-house leak protection systems utilizing flow-based technologies. A number of insurance companies offer policyholders reduced rates for installing a whole-house leak protection system.

As far as insurance coverage is concerned, damage caused by surface water intrusion to the dwelling is considered flood damage and is normally excluded from coverage under traditional homeowners' insurance. Surface water is water that enters the dwelling from the surface of the ground because of inundation or insufficient drainage and causes loss to the dwelling. Coverage for surface water intrusion[5] to the dwelling would usually require a separate flood insurance policy.

Categories

[edit]

There are three basic categories of water damage, based on the level of contamination.

Category 1 Water - Refers to a source of water that does not pose substantial threat to humans and classified as "clean water". Examples are broken water supply lines, tub or sink overflows or appliance malfunctions that involves water supply lines.

Category 2 Water - Refers to a source of water that contains a significant degree of chemical, biological or physical contaminants and causes discomfort or sickness when consumed or even exposed to. Known as "grey water". This type carries microorganisms and nutrients of micro-organisms. Examples are toilet bowls with urine (no feces), sump pump failures, seepage due to hydrostatic failure and water discharge from dishwashers or washing machines.

Category 3 Water - Known as "black water" and is grossly unsanitary. This water contains unsanitary agents, harmful bacteria and fungi, causing severe discomfort or sickness. Type 3 category are contaminated water sources that affect the indoor environment. This category includes water sources from sewage, seawater, rising water from rivers or streams, storm surge, ground surface water or standing water. Category 2 Water or Grey Water that is not promptly removed from the structure and or have remained stagnant may be re classified as Category 3 Water. Toilet back flows that originates from beyond the toilet trap is considered black water contamination regardless of visible content or color.[6]

Classes

[edit]

Class of water damage is determined by the probable rate of evaporation based on the type of materials affected, or wet, in the room or space that was flooded. Determining the class of water damage is an important first step, and will determine the amount and type of equipment utilized to dry-down the structure.[7]

Class 1 - Slow Rate of Evaporation. Affects only a portion of a room. Materials have a low permeance/porosity. Minimum moisture is absorbed by the materials. **IICRC s500 2016 update adds that class 1 be indicated when <5% of the total square footage of a room (ceiling+walls+floor) are affected **

Class 2 - Fast Rate of Evaporation. Water affects the entire room of carpet and cushion. May have wicked up the walls, but not more than 24 inches. **IICRC s500 2016 update adds that class 2 be indicated when 5% to 40% of the total square footage of a room (ceiling+walls+floor) are affected **

Class 3 - Fastest Rate of Evaporation. Water generally comes from overhead, affecting the entire area; walls, ceilings, insulation, carpet, cushion, etc. **IICRC s500 2016 update adds that class 3 be indicated when >40% of the total square footage of a room (ceiling+walls+floor) are affected **

Class 4 - Specialty Drying Situations. Involves materials with a very low permeance/porosity, such as hardwood floors, concrete, crawlspaces, gypcrete, plaster, etc. Drying generally requires very low specific humidity to accomplish drying.

Restoration

[edit]

Water damage restoration can be performed by property management teams, building maintenance personnel, or by the homeowners themselves; however, contacting a certified professional water damage restoration specialist is often regarded as the safest way to restore water damaged property. Certified professional water damage restoration specialists utilize psychrometrics to monitor the drying process.[8]

Standards and regulation

[edit]

While there are currently no government regulations in the United States dictating procedures, two certifying bodies, the Institute of Inspection Cleaning and Restoration Certification (IICRC) and the RIA, do recommend standards of care. The current IICRC standard is ANSI/IICRC S500-2021.[9] It is the collaborative work of the IICRC, SCRT, IEI, IAQA, and NADCA.

Fire and Water Restoration companies are regulated by the appropriate state's Department of Consumer Affairs - usually the state contractors license board. In California, all Fire and Water Restoration companies must register with the California Contractors State License Board.[10] Presently, the California Contractors State License Board has no specific classification for "water and fire damage restoration."

Procedures

[edit]

Water damage restoration is often prefaced by a loss assessment and evaluation of affected materials. The damaged area is inspected with water sensing equipment such as probes and other infrared tools in order to determine the source of the damage and possible extent of areas affected. Emergency mitigation services are the first order of business. Controlling the source of water, removal of non-salvageable materials, water extraction and pre-cleaning of impacted materials are all part of the mitigation process. Restoration services would then be rendered to the property in order to dry the structure, stabilize building materials, sanitize any affected or cross-contaminated areas, and deodorize all affected areas and materials. After the labor is completed, water damage equipment including air movers, air scrubbers, dehumidifiers, wood floor drying systems, and sub-floor drying equipment is left in the residence. The goal of the drying process is to stabilize the moisture content of impacted materials below 15%, the generally accepted threshold for microbial amplification. Industry standards state that drying vendors should return at regular time intervals, preferably every twenty-four hours, to monitor the equipment, temperature, humidity, and moisture content of the affected walls and contents.[6] In conclusion, key aspects of water damage restoration include fast action, adequate equipment, moisture measurements, and structural drying. Dehumidification is especially crucial for structural components affected by water damage, such as wooden beams, flooring, and drywall.

See also

[edit]
  • Indoor mold

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Individual Disaster Assistance". DisasterAssistance.gov. Retrieved 2009-09-28.
  2. ^ "How We Use Water". 16 January 2017.
  3. ^ The University of Maine Corporate Extension – www.umext.maine.edu
  4. ^ Herndon Jr., Everette L.; Yang, Chin S. (August 2000). "Mold & Mildew: A Creeping Catastrophe". Claims Magazine. Archived from the original on 2000-08-15. Retrieved November 4, 2016.
  5. ^ Moisture Control Guidance for Building Design, Construction and Maintenance. December 2013.
  6. ^ "Water Damage Restoration Guideline" (PDF). Northern Arizona University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-06-26. Retrieved 2 September 2014.
  7. ^ "The Basics Of Water Damage Restoration Training". www.iicrc.org. Retrieved 2016-11-03.
  8. ^ "Chapter 6: Psychrometry and the Science of Drying". IICRC Standards Subscription Site. Institute of Inspection, Cleaning and Restoration Certification. Retrieved 27 September 2020.
  9. ^ "ANSI/IICRC S500 Water Damage Restoration". IICRC. 22 December 2020. Retrieved 14 February 2022.
  10. ^ "California Contractors State License Board". State of California. Retrieved 2010-08-29.
Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo

Driving Directions in Cook County


Driving Directions From Hoffman Estates Park District to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From AMC South Barrington 24 to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Hampton Inn & Suites Chicago/Hoffman Estates to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Barrington Lakes Apartments to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Millennium Park to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Glessner House to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Jackson (Andrew) Park to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Jackson (Andrew) Park to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From WNDR Museum to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From The Art Institute of Chicago to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc

Reviews for United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc


United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc

Paul Gunderlock

(4)

The staff was helpful, very nice and easy to work with and completed the work timely and cleaned up well. Communications faltered a bit at times and there was an email communications glitch which was no fault of anyone, but no big deal and all ended up fine. We sure feel better to have this done and hope that is the end of our structural issues. It does seem like (after talking to several related companies), that it would be great if some of these related companies had a structural engineer on staff vs using on the job expertise gained over years - which is definitely valuable! But leaves a bit of uncertainty - and probably saves money for both sides may be the trade-off? So far, so good though! Thank you.

United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc

Sarah McNeily

(5)

USS was excellent. They are honest, straightforward, trustworthy, and conscientious. They thoughtfully removed the flowers and flower bulbs to dig where they needed in the yard, replanted said flowers and spread the extra dirt to fill in an area of the yard. We've had other services from different companies and our yard was really a mess after. They kept the job site meticulously clean. The crew was on time and friendly. I'd recommend them any day! Thanks to Jessie and crew.

United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc

Jim de Leon

(5)

It was a pleasure to work with Rick and his crew. From the beginning, Rick listened to my concerns and what I wished to accomplish. Out of the 6 contractors that quoted the project, Rick seemed the MOST willing to accommodate my wishes. His pricing was definitely more than fair as well. I had 10 push piers installed to stabilize and lift an addition of my house. The project commenced at the date that Rick had disclosed initially and it was completed within the same time period expected (based on Rick's original assessment). The crew was well informed, courteous, and hard working. They were not loud (even while equipment was being utilized) and were well spoken. My neighbors were very impressed on how polite they were when they entered / exited my property (saying hello or good morning each day when they crossed paths). You can tell they care about the customer concerns. They ensured that the property would be put back as clean as possible by placing MANY sheets of plywood down prior to excavating. They compacted the dirt back in the holes extremely well to avoid large stock piles of soils. All the while, the main office was calling me to discuss updates and expectations of completion. They provided waivers of lien, certificates of insurance, properly acquired permits, and JULIE locates. From a construction background, I can tell you that I did not see any flaws in the way they operated and this an extremely professional company. The pictures attached show the push piers added to the foundation (pictures 1, 2 & 3), the amount of excavation (picture 4), and the restoration after dirt was placed back in the pits and compacted (pictures 5, 6 & 7). Please notice that they also sealed two large cracks and steel plated these cracks from expanding further (which you can see under my sliding glass door). I, as well as my wife, are extremely happy that we chose United Structural Systems for our contractor. I would happily tell any of my friends and family to use this contractor should the opportunity arise!

United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc

Chris Abplanalp

(5)

USS did an amazing job on my underpinning on my house, they were also very courteous to the proximity of my property line next to my neighbor. They kept things in order with all the dirt/mud they had to excavate. They were done exactly in the timeframe they indicated, and the contract was very details oriented with drawings of what would be done. Only thing that would have been nice, is they left my concrete a little muddy with boot prints but again, all-in-all a great job

United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc

Dave Kari

(5)

What a fantastic experience! Owner Rick Thomas is a trustworthy professional. Nick and the crew are hard working, knowledgeable and experienced. I interviewed every company in the area, big and small. A homeowner never wants to hear that they have foundation issues. Out of every company, I trusted USS the most, and it paid off in the end. Highly recommend.

View GBP